Article View: sci.crypt
Article #737Re: Secure network: what form?
From: Randall Atkinson
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:08
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:08
23 lines
1563 bytes
1563 bytes
In article <9208272105.AA12700@news.cis.ohio-state.edu> Marc.Ringuette@daisy.learning.cs.cmu.edu writes: >I presume we all agree that we should move towards some form of secure >email and some means of exchanging public keys. There are a number of >other cryptographic services we could ask for. I presume we do NOT all >agree on exactly what form they should take. Movement has been underway for some time now. Privacy-Enhanced Mail (PEM) should appear in the Internet within the year (famous last words :-). Older RFCs for PEM are online. A newer set was just/is about to be released. >How do you think we should take advantage of cryptography in the next >generation network? What tools would you use? What organization? Is >there anything you want particularly to avoid? I think it's important >for us to develop a more accurate vision of what it is that we want. >Otherwise, how will people know what to implement for us? All good questions. The IETF has several groups actively working on Internet Security, some under the Security Area and some under other areas. Ran atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3464@ra.nrl.navy.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!dtix!mimsy!ra!atkinsonReferences:
<9208272105.AA12700@news.cis.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!dtix!mimsy!ra!atkinson From: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Randall Atkinson) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Secure network: what form? Message-ID: <3464@ra.nrl.navy.mil> Date: 27 Aug 92 22:08:18 GMT References: <9208272105.AA12700@news.cis.ohio-state.edu> Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil Distribution: usa Organization: Naval Research Laboratory, DC Lines: 23