🚀 go-pugleaf

>enemies (encryption devices are considered to be weapons -- remember, the
>development of computers was catalyzed by the use of encryption during
>WWII), and selling working implementations of DES is considered
>facilitation.  There are also published articles that detail how to build
>bombs, yet the government also controls their export as well.

Hey, that means that there won't be laws against encryption in USA,
since the second amendment guarantees to right to keep and bear arms.
Or perhaps it was a misprint and the right was only to keep bear arms
after all, since other kinds of arms have many restrictions even
today.  Bummer - but perhaps someone can design an encryption
algorithm which is to be used against bears, and so you guys in USA
would be guaranteed to use that freely?

//Jyrki