Article View: sci.crypt
Article #829Re: PGP *2.0* available
From: Nonsenso
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 04:56
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 04:56
11 lines
890 bytes
890 bytes
-> What the PGP docs should say is that you don't need to keep your -> public key _confidential_. It DOES say so. The manually explicitely states that you should share your public key with as many people/systems as possible. What you _should_ keep confidential is your private key. There could have been a problem with pgp 1.0 when keys could not be certified. That way it'd be easy for anyone to forge a key on your user-ID and sit in the middle of communications. PGP 2.0 features this key-certification and is thus a lot stronger regarding to key-security than the 1.0 version.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<716015512.F00005@utopia.hacktic.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!hacktic!utopia!NEWSShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!hacktic!utopia!NEWS From: Nonsenso@utopia.hacktic.nl (Nonsenso) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: PGP *2.0* available Message-ID: <716015512.F00005@utopia.hacktic.nl> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 02:56:54 -0200 Sender: NEWS@utopia.hacktic.nl Lines: 12