Article View: sci.crypt
Article #929Re: "Sneakers" -- action/adventure movie about Cryptography
From: Tom Truscott
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 20:11
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 20:11
11 lines
990 bytes
990 bytes
>>Anyways, one-time pads are really effective in short >>messages and are reasonably secure on larger documents. Arguably this is backwards. As suggested in "Codebreakers", if I suspect that a "yes" or "no" decision is forthcoming, and I intercept a 3 character long message, I can make a reasonable guess as to the message's contents. More generally, "traffic analysis" is still a threat. So some systems send continuously, just sending nulls or-ed with the pad (== the pad itself) when there is no real traffic.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<715637499@romeo.cs.duke.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!gatech!concert!duke!trtReferences:
<1992Sep1.060412.14956@fig.citib.com> <naran.715539174@sfu.ca> <1992Sep3.185207.29154@news.eng.convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!gatech!concert!duke!trt From: trt@duke.cs.duke.edu (Tom Truscott) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.security.misc Subject: Re: "Sneakers" -- action/adventure movie about Cryptography Message-ID: <715637499@romeo.cs.duke.edu> Date: 4 Sep 92 20:11:40 GMT References: <1992Sep1.060412.14956@fig.citib.com> <naran.715539174@sfu.ca> <1992Sep3.185207.29154@news.eng.convex.com> Followup-To: sci.crypt Organization: IBM RTP Lines: 11