🚀 go-pugleaf

YOU get to vote on
*   whether the police could "require" you to give up your fingerprints and
*   private information or put any of that on a "license" in a bar-code, or
*   put it in their computers?  NO?  Neither did the Alabama legislature.
*   THAT IS TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.
*   
*     If DPS gets by with this, the information on your driver's license
*   will be "scanned" into a computer and stored.  The police can find out
*   anyplace you use your driver's license -- where you bank, how often,
*   where you shop, what you buy, where you go -- anyplace your driver's
*   license is used for "i.d." and is "scanned".  Every store you do
*   business with can ALSO store all this information about you on THEIR
*   computers, wherever you use your driver's license.  It has nothing to do
*   with driving or "making the roads safe."  It has EVERYTHING to do with
*   making it easy for police and others to spy on you and control you.
*   
*     The same company making the national I.D. card for Communist China
*   will be providing the technology to Alabama to make this happen.  Seven
*   months ago, the laboratory that makes the equipment for the
*   fingerprinting, barcoding and scanning, brazenly announced it has a
*   contract with the State of Alabama, and only recently, has the WHOLE
*   truth, about DPS's plan to require the fingerprinting, barcoding, and
*   scanning come out.
*   
*      They claim to be "accepting public comments" about this until July
*   8th!  BE PUBLIC AND COMMENT!!!

This is the main way our Federal Government is rolling out the National ID
Card, using a Universal Biometric Card: driver's licenses.

Divide and Conquer, state by state.

It is the beginning of the end.

Don't think the biometric driver's licenses are the exact equivalent of a
National ID Card? Check out this phrasing from an unimplemented law:

#   Privacy Journal, By Robert Ellis Smith, October 1983 issue
#
#   Senator Bob Dole wants the government to conduct