Thread View: sci.crypt
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by francois.grieu
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:48
@@@@@ what Murad's payable final appeals, John smells in conjunction with ambitious, gross games @@@@@
Author: francois.grieu
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:48
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:48
35 lines
1801 bytes
1801 bytes
many of the same # tracking purposes an one embedded in the body? ---- Sure, government can give debate reasons for requiring fingerprinting for driver's licenses... But it is still a violation of the minimization requirement of the Privacy Act of 1974. Biometric data on citizens is FAR BEYOND any reason government can give. Notice how no citizens in any state ever got to vote on such an important escalation of personal data collection by the government. Indeed, it seems to be accomplished in the quietest way possible, giving citizens the least amount of opportunity to choose their fate. Odd, since tax-payer paid-for government services is what gives them the power. But elected representatives will do, you say? Did you hear any of them mention it during campaigning? Did Alabama elected officials even mention it with their press release of a new driver's license, despite that being the plan? No. What does that tell you? We need a cabinet-level Privacy Commission, with the power to interven
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads