Thread View: sci.crypt
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Anthony M Lovell
Mon, 28 Sep 1987 15:29
Any Beale Cipher Fans out there?
Author: Anthony M Lovell
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1987 15:29
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1987 15:29
5 lines
778 bytes
778 bytes
I'm interested in finding if there are any people in Netland who have done anything at all with the Beale Ciphers. Send me some mail, I'm interested in hearing about approaches taken by other people. Tony Lovell .... amlovell@phoenix.princeton.edu
Re: Any Beale Cipher Fans out there?
Author: whp
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1987 06:42
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1987 06:42
15 lines
1548 bytes
1548 bytes
I was recently reading D. Denning's book on "cryptogaphy and data security"; she reports findings by J. Gillogly in 1980 (I have a reference if you want) that tend to show that they are a hoax. In B1, deciphered using initial letters of Declaration of Independence, the following sequence shows up in the plaintext: ABFDEFGHIJKLMMNOHPP. The finst F is encrypted as 195 and word 194 begins with a C. Also the last H is encrypted as 301 and word 302 begins with an O. Somebody named Hammer claims to have found 23 encryption errors in B1, so its likely that F for C and H for O were typos, and that the sequence should be: ABCDEFGHIJKLMMNOOPP. You must admit this is an unlikely sequence to turn up unless the DOI is the key and the message is a hoax. I will be the first to admit that it is also possible this sequence is a clue. I wonder what famous books, authors, or documents in the early 1800s have the Wayne Pollock initials MOP (the only doubled letters)?
Re: Any Beale Cipher Fans out there?
Author: jim
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1987 16:45
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1987 16:45
20 lines
1634 bytes
1634 bytes
In article <785@phoenix.PRINCETON.EDU> amlovell@phoenix.PRINCETON.EDU (Anthony M Lovell) writes:
>I'm interested in finding if there are any people in Netland who have
>done anything at all with the Beale Ciphers. Send me some mail, I'm
>interested in hearing about approaches taken by other people.
I wrote a paper a few years ago for Cryptologia, in which I found that
if B1 is "decrypted" with the Declaration of Independence (the key to
B2), the result is largely garbage, but with a couple of alphabetically
increasing strings. One is quite long; I don't remember the exact string,
but it is of the form ABFDEFGGHIJKLLMMNO or something of that sort. Way
too long to be accidental. I presented it as something a would-be
decryptor of B1 must take into account in any alleged decryption, since
it can't arise by chance. I personally feel that it's a pretty good
demonstration that the Beale Ciphers are a hoax.
Needless to say, Dr. Hammer and the Beale Cypher Association don't agree.
--
Jim Gillogly
{hplabs, ihnp4}!sdcrdcf!randvax!jim
jim@rand-unix.arpa
Re: Any Beale Cipher Fans out there?
Author: Jim Gillogly
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1987 16:38
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1987 16:38
14 lines
1079 bytes
1079 bytes
In article <282@apr.UUCP> whp@apr.UUCP (Wayne Pollock) writes:
> Somebody named Hammer claims to have found 23 encryption
>errors in B1, so its likely that F for C and H for O were typos, and that the
^
|
This should be B2, the document that described the contents of the treasure.
>sequence should be: ABCDEFGHIJKLMMNOOPP. You must admit this is an unlikely
>sequence to turn up unless the DOI is the key and the message is a hoax.
--
Jim Gillogly
{hplabs, ihnp4}!sdcrdcf!randvax!jim
jim@rand-unix.arpa
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads