Thread View: sci.crypt
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Christopher_C_Lapp
Sat, 08 Aug 1992 17:51
NSA and the ATA
Author: Christopher_C_Lapp
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 17:51
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 17:51
10 lines
792 bytes
792 bytes
I noticed a full page advertisement recruiting for the National security agency in the American Translators Association bulletin. Why would the NSA want language types? I thought they did alot number-crunching and your average translator has had little or no math background. Also, don't they have a whole much of Defense Language School types who have been drilled in every language imaginable? Is the NSA just fishing? Are they desparate for talent or what? Any comments? Chris Lapp
Re: NSA and the ATA
Author: Paul Rubin
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 16:51
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 16:51
21 lines
1614 bytes
1614 bytes
(Of course, the *ideal* person might have a lot of linguistics *and*
a lot of group theory and other relevant math *and* a hefty dose of
high-performance computer expertise. Such people are probably rather
hard to find, though...)
*And* be willing to work for a secret spook agency. Those are
even harder to find...
Here's a semi-counterexample though: I used to know a hippie type
who was a grad student in Turkish Literature, but who came from the US.
He did various odd jobs to get by until one day the DoD asked
if he would like them to pay all his school expenses---with almost no
obligations. Seems they decided Turkish was a "strategic" language
and they were willing to spring some $$$ just to make sure that
at least a few US nationals understood it. After he accepted,
he basically never heard from them except they paid his bills
and every now and then would send him documents in Turkish and
ask for translations. He said the documents were always innocuous
news reports etc. and he suspected that their only purpose was
to make sure he was still around and studying.
Re: NSA and the ATA
Author: Jonathan Thornburg
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 23:21
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 23:21
40 lines
2476 bytes
2476 bytes
In article <63663@cup.portal.com> Christopher_C_Lapp@cup.portal.com writes:
>I noticed a full page advertisement recruiting for the National
>security agency in the American Translators Association bulletin.
>Why would the NSA want language types? I thought they did alot
>number-crunching and your average translator has had little or
>no math background. Also, don't they have a whole much of
>Defense Language School types who have been drilled in every
>language imaginable?
I suspect that messages sent between (say) the Saudi Arabian Oil
Ministry and it's London office, might well be in languages other
than US Standard English...
More seriously, James Bamford "The Puzzle Palace" (Houghton Mifflin,
1982 / Penguin, 1983; ISBN 0-14-006748-5) quotes "A former [UK GCHQ]
A Group voice-processing specialist" as saying
"You operate primarily on key words, because
there is no way that in a year [of Russian
language school] you are going to comprehend
the language well enough to understand what's
going on. They've had second-generation
people who have had a hard time because some
people slur, and there is geographical variance,
so they expect a non-native to just operate
on the key words -- when you hear the word
missle, for example."
In other words, governmental crypto agancies need a lot of linguists,
and at least some of these have to be pretty good. Thus the ATA ad.
(Of course, the *ideal* person might have a lot of linguistics *and*
a lot of group theory and other relevant math *and* a hefty dose of
high-performance computer expertise. Such people are probably rather
hard to find, though...)
- Jonathan Thornburg
<jonathan@einstein.ph.utexas.edu> or <jonathan@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu>
University of Texas at Austin / Physics Dept / Center for Relativity
and (for a few more months) U of British Columbia / {Astronomy,Physics}
Re: NSA and the ATA
Author: Mr. Lyn R. Kennedy
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1992 20:58
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1992 20:58
25 lines
1576 bytes
1576 bytes
Christopher_C_Lapp@cup.portal.com writes:
> I noticed a full page advertisement recruiting for the National
> security agency in the American Translators Association bulletin.
> Why would the NSA want language types? I thought they did alot
> number-crunching and your average translator has had little or
> no math background. Also, don't they have a whole much of
> Defense Language School types who have been drilled in every
> language imaginable? Is the NSA just fishing? Are they desparate
> for talent or what?
My guess is that since they relied on the military for many of those
functions, they may need to build up their own staff due to cutbacks in
the military. Much of the NSA's monitoring is supposed to be open
sources that need to be translated before being passed on to the
analysts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
73, internet | lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org
Lyn Kennedy packet radio | K5QWB @ N5LDD.#NTX.TX.US.NA
pony express | P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154
-------------- "We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo --------------
Re: NSA and the ATA
Author: Joseph F. Hull
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 16:56
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 16:56
12 lines
1204 bytes
1204 bytes
The translation sections are (almost) completely separate from the technical sections. The
requirement for linguists who are also math (or computer science or ...) trained is to
translate technical documents from the source language into English (a noticeably different
skill than translating ordinary conversations). In general, Americans are so "America-
centered" it is quite difficult for intelligence / military / commercial interests to find
enough adequately skilled people to satisfy the demand (for translators).
--
_ _
/_ / ) / ) Jeff Hull hull@den.mmc.com
//_) -/- -/- 1544 S. Vaughn Cir
/_/ \_/ / / Aurora, CO 80012 303-977-1061
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads