Thread View: sci.crypt
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by francois.grieu
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:38
@@@@@ occasionally, go reinforce a Ms @@@@@
Author: francois.grieu
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:38
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:38
27 lines
2343 bytes
2343 bytes
Social Security numbers? They were supposedly
* "for our good," too, just to insure that we were signed up in the social
* security program for our retirement in years to come, right? The old
* cards said, "Not for identification purposes." Now, you can't get a
* BANK ACCOUNT without one, and your money and financial transactions are
* reported to goons and thugs at the IRS who are happy to steal money from
* grandmothers. In fact, the IRS can get your bank records WITHOUT YOUR
* PERMISSION.
[
: ftp ftp.fourmilab.ch, cd /pub/kelvin/documents, get unicard.doc
For more than a decade, the United States Internal Revenue Service
has allowed taxpayers with only regular wage income and the
standard deduction to simply sign their return and have the IRS
calculate the tax. With increased reporting of all financial
transactions to the IRS by banks, stockbrokers, mutual funds, real
estate title companies, etc., IRS officials have stated on several
occasions over the last few years that the day when the
overwhelming number of taxpayers could have their taxes calculated
automatically was not very far in the future.
]
* Again, telling people to get a "social security" number was
* about CONTROL, not "protecting" us. Who is in control now? (Did you
* know you are not REQUIRED to have or use a social security number by ANY
* law?)
*
* Being required to pay money to the state for these licenses means
* that licensing is also another form of TAX. Did YO
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads