Article View: sci.econ
Article #1702Re: Declining Intro Enrolments
From: David Friedman
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:47
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:47
34 lines
2739 bytes
2739 bytes
In article <1hl507INNoaq@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>, Hal.Varian@umich.edu discusses his views on teaching economics in the context of his textbook and classes. I have not been teaching principles in recent years, but I am interested in teaching micro, both as a teacher (although only occasionally of late, since I am currently at a law school) and textbook author, so I thought I would put in a few comments. One of the problems in teaching economics is that the students think they already know it. The subject is all around them, and many of our technical terms are words, such as "efficiency," whose meaning they think they know. So a student goes along for a month "translating" the logical structure he is being taught into a much fuzzier form along the lines of what he already knows and only discovers that he is missing something when he fails the midterm. One solution to this I like is to get strongly counterintuitive results. When you reach a conclusion the student knows is wrong (one of my favorites is the argument showing that legalized polygeny benefits women but not necessarily men, and vice versa for legalized polyandry) he suddenly has to pay attention. So far as computer programs, I think it is possible to do much more than automated testing. I have a collection of three programs that go with my text (all of which I wrote). In one, which is designed to help students intuit the calculus concepts that they forgot from the previous year's math course, the student draws either TC, MC, or AC freehand on the screen (with a mouse), while the computer draws in one or both of the others. That way the student can play around with the curve, trying to how the curves are related. In another you have a MacDraw like environment for doing budget line indifference curve diagrams. My original idea is that if a student encounters indifference curves as a picture in a book showing 3 of them, he will assume there is nothing in between. If he encounters them as "click anywhere, the program draws the indifference curve through that point" he is more likely to get the intuition that they are dense.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DDFr-110193133204@law-mac-3.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!law-mac-3.uchicago.edu!userReferences:
<thompson.724945888@daphne.socsci.umn.edu> <1hl507INNoaq@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.econ Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!law-mac-3.uchicago.edu!user From: DDFr@Midway.UChicago.Edu (David Friedman) Subject: Re: Declining Intro Enrolments Message-ID: <DDFr-110193133204@law-mac-3.uchicago.edu> Followup-To: sci.econ Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System) Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations References: <thompson.724945888@daphne.socsci.umn.edu> <1hl507INNoaq@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:47:27 GMT Lines: 34