Article View: sci.econ
Article #2104Re: Technological Singularity
From: Richard
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 00:00
99 lines
5433 bytes
5433 bytes
On 8 Jun 1998 13:37:46 GMT, patrick@gryphon.psych.ox.ac.uk (Patrick Juola) wrote: >For example, one of the hard problems (towards which large steps have >been taken, but which has not been solved) is the identify-friend-or-foe >(IFF) problem. In a nutshell, "friendly fire isn't" -- and you don't >want to shoot at your friends. So it would be useful to install cutouts >on your weapons so that you don't shoot friendlies by mistake. And if >the cutouts worked, then you don't need to detail as many men to sentry >duty; a bunch of automated machine guns could be set up to shoot at >any hostiles crossing an area. This makes this whole "Halt! Who goes >there? Pass, friend!" schtick a thing of the past -- or would make it >if the IFF stuff worked. > >The military does *NOT* want mindless order-following machines; they >want machines that follow orders when given and otherwise do something >"intelligent." Hence the interest in AI. > > -kitten So if I stole one of the "friendly" trucks.. I could happily drive past your AI machine guns and blow up your base.. Sounds like a distinctly tricky problem which is probably why it hasn't been solved yet.. As for the singularity issues it would seem that the main point is the subservience or partial / total aniahlation of the human race (as we know it) yes we as human animals have evolved and developed into very complex beings.. No more complex on a biological or physical level than other animals in fact quite a lot LESS complex than some organisms.. But we have developed a mental state and social capacity that has put us in better control of our environment.. What we dont seem to be able to do that well is control that environment WELL.. It is the human hunger for knowledge that will lead ( if it happens ) to the singularity. If we develope some technology with its own cognitive and reproductive capacity then regardless of whether it is nanotech, biological, mechanical, technological, AI or any combination of these.. Surely it will be at the same mercy of our control as the elements of our environment are.. We live and breath in our environment everyday but we have not mastered it to the point of being able to find a cure for pollution or global warming.. History has shown us that we have a great capacity for working things out and finding new and better explanations of the world around us.. We use this knowledge to advance inventions and new technologies.. The invention of the car was heralded as one of mans greatest achievements of the day.. But it has left us a legacy of pollution and increased illness in children.. Allthough no one could be said to be subservient to a car surely it is still having a direct and profound impact on human life.. Surely the concept of the singularity is not about the discovery of a technology or the development of it.. But it is the use and ultimate control we have over it and its use.. Einstein wept when hiroshima was bombed he had theorised the theory of relativity as a neat way to end up older than your parents and get your own back ( twins paradox ).. Its was not the technology that caused the devastation and fear of the nuclear age but the use of the knowledge.. As has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread.. The millitary always seems to have its hands in the best technology and therefore the new ideas and discoveries are bound to be used for militaristic purposes.. We are all responsible for what we know and learn.. It is an unfortunate fact of human development that what people are responsible for knowing they do not always accept the same level of responsibility for the use of what they know... A singularity could happen, it could be happening, it could have happened allready but we just haven't noticed yet.. We can allready see a 2 tier society forming between people who understand the technology and those who do not.. We should look to the industrial revolution for lessons.. I have said enough.. I am not a fully qualified AI guru.. nor am I a historian.. I just believe that knowledge is a tool and like any tool in the wrong hands it can do considerable damage.. Rich.. *************************************************** It seemed to me a superlative thing, To know the explanation of everything, Why it comes to be, why it perishes, why it is. (Socrates) ***************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<357d0965.96296777@usilnews.cai.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<357857B7.5244@sigmatechinc.com> <897299396.23952.0.nnrp-02.c2d9a433@news.demon.co.uk> <357BD9B4.72E0@remove.muenchen.this.org.junk> <6lgpfa$hfa$1@news.ox.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,3de6aaf66239df89 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,public X-Google-Thread: 1045ed,3de6aaf66239df89 X-Google-Attributes: gid1045ed,public X-Google-Thread: fd6dd,3de6aaf66239df89 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd6dd,public X-Google-Thread: 102b75,3de6aaf66239df89 X-Google-Attributes: gid102b75,public X-Google-Thread: 10461e,3de6aaf66239df89 X-Google-Attributes: gid10461e,public From: davri06-spam@cai.com (Richard) Subject: Re: Technological Singularity Date: 1998/06/09 Message-ID: <357d0965.96296777@usilnews.cai.com> X-Deja-AN: 360974975 References: <357857B7.5244@sigmatechinc.com> <897299396.23952.0.nnrp-02.c2d9a433@news.demon.co.uk> <357BD9B4.72E0@remove.muenchen.this.org.junk> <6lgpfa$hfa$1@news.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: richard@nospam.pinwheel.co.uk Organization: Computer Associates Int Newsgroups: sci.econ,bionet.neuroscience,comp.ai,comp.arch,comp.robotics.misc