🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <dpc7f40ffl@news2.newsguy.com>, The Trucker wrote:
> "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:99udnVFEOdqoIijeRVn-tg@comcast.com...
>> In article <1135949937.964093.264460@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, 
>> jay_stutz@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> And President "Suck and Duck" Bush wobbles about making speeches about
>>> Iraq when the little turd fails to seal our southern border. Democrats
>>> are no better but this "lesser of two evils" premise is bullshit. Purge
>>> all these bastards.
>>
>> What makes you think they are two different parties right now? I cannot
>> find any significant evidence that they are, just a lot of superficial
>> disagreements.
>>
>> It seems pretty obvious we are being played for suckers when the
>> democrats spend about 5 years demanding clinton bring about regime
>> change in Iraq and then the moment a suitable excuse arises the
>> republicans go and do exactly that.
> 
> Clinton wanted internal revolt in Iraq.  That could have been done.

If bush the elder had provided air support for the internal revolt it would 
have been finished shortly after gulf war 1. 

> The Kurds should have beenarmed and assisted by the USA and
> controlled with regard to oppression of other two sects.  That
> is what sane people do thatg are not power mongering prancing
> Repugnican pigs bent on world imperialism.

Democrats were calling for what shrub did up until shrub was elected.

>> Same with illegal immigration, only the people are hurt by it. Not the
>> republicrats and their money sources, not the government. They are
>> helped by it so nothing of value is ever done about it until people do
>> it themselves. A bunch of guys sitting in lawn chairs watching the
>> border were pretty damn effective. What would a decent scattering of
>> military personal accomplish?  Seems everyone wants a military base
>> these days, so I doubt border states would turn it down.

> Agreed.  I am very disillusioned with the Dems.  It has to do
> withlabor unions wanting to differentiate themselves from
> the new laborers, I think. To show that if you are non-union
> you lose.

Unions, once with a good purpose and goal became thugs, mob controlled, 
and served only to try and control the avialible supply of labor for the 
reward of the union itself and occasionally members who ended up paid way 
out of proportion to the jobs they did.  Illegal immigration will bring 
about their final collaspe. 

Are there any good unions left?  I don't know of any. 

If the democrats were really for "the little guy" they would have stamped 
out illegal immigration long ago. Instead, they see it as bringing in 
more "little guys" to support them.