Article View: sci.econ
Article #2292Re: The House immigration bill will probably target businesses
From: jay_stutz
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:41
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:41
106 lines
6649 bytes
6649 bytes
Alcibiades wrote: > They are talking about the Sensenbrenner Bill in this article, a bill > which will be announced today. He is the Judiciary Committee Chairman > who has control of immigration legislation in the House, so whatever > enforcement bill is passed, it will be what he offers. It will be an > amalgamation of the various enforcement bills we've heard about in the > last several months. He is on our side, but the Senate will produce a > Guest Worker bill to meet it. > > The good thing about it is that it will likely include Electronic > Verification for employers of new hires. That is the crux of this > whole problem, or course. All of us can think of places we know and > businesses we've worked that are now full of Illegals who would fail > the Electronic Verification. It would be a LOT of fun busting these > people. But the Senate's Guest Worker would no doubt try to fold > existing Illegals into their plan. We shall see. > > http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20051206-104704-2743r > > House immigration bill targets businesses > By Stephen Dinan > The Washington Times > Published December 6, 2005 > > WASHINGTON -- The House Republican immigration-enforcement bill will > include a measure aimed directly at ensuring that employers are taking > steps to hire legal workers -- going a step further than the White > House has gone in targeting businesses. > > The bill, which Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James > Sensenbrenner Jr. of Wisconsin is expected to introduce today, calls > on employers to check documents submitted by new employees against a > database to verify their authenticity. > > "This is the one thing you can really do that really will work," > said Rep. Ken Calvert, a California Republican who has been fighting > for the provisions for years. "You're not picking one group of people > or another group of people. All you're doing is checking the validity > of a Social Security card -- I don't know how anybody can be against > that." > > Named the Basic Pilot Program, it began in the mid-1990s as a > voluntary system for employers in a handful of states to check > prospective employees' Social Security numbers. In 2003, it was > expanded nationwide, but it is still voluntary. Mr. Sensenbrenner's > bill would make it a requirement. > > Mr. Sensenbrenner, who as committee chairman is writing the bill, > will call on employers to recheck the documents of all employees hired > within the past six years. Mr. Calvert's version does not. > > Mr. Sensenbrenner yesterday said his bill would be the beginning > of "a serious interior immigration enforcement effort." > > His bill also would increase penalties for human trafficking and > would adopt provisions from a bill sponsored by Rep. John Culberson, > Texas Republican, that would authorize and fund efforts by sheriffs in > border counties to go after illegal aliens. > > "This legislation will demand that people follow the law and be > held accountable for their actions," Mr. Sensenbrenner said. > > President Bush last week took credit for expanding the Basic Pilot > Program, but he did not call for it to become mandatory. Workplace > enforcement is one area where Republicans are openly critical of Mr. > Bush, saying he cannot hope to solve the immigration problem without > improvement in that area. > > Work site arrests of illegal aliens have fallen every year of his > administration, from 953 in 2000 to 159 in 2004. And last year, the > federal government issued just three notices of intent to fine > companies for employing illegal aliens, down from 178 in 2000. > > Business groups have questioned whether the system can work, and > they and immigration-rights advocates say it sometimes returns a flag > even on a U.S. citizen. > > They also want to see a broader bill that includes a guest-worker > program and legalizes most of the current illegal alien population, > saying an enforcement-only approach won't work. > > Tamar Jacoby, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, said she > thinks Mr. Sensenbrenner would have preferred to write a broader bill. > That makes her optimistic that in the next Congress the House will > take up a comprehensive bill that includes guest-worker provisions. > > "It would be a mistake to think this is his bottom line, and he > can go no further," she said. > > If the bill passes the committee this week, it could be on the > floor next week, and some Republicans are already lobbying for leaders > to allow floor votes on a series of amendments. Rep. Tom Tancredo, > Colorado Republican and chairman of the 92-member Immigration Reform > Caucus, said this is the first opportunity in nearly a decade to have > such a broad immigration debate. > > "It could not have come at a more critical time for the country," > he said, urging broad rules for the floor debate. "This opportunity is > too important and too rare to take ideas off the table." > > --------------- Rip the nuts off those who knowingly employ illegal aliens. Jay
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1133905277.438531.179650@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ncsbp1pct31a0tp7aa45qn6fqoehm6ka4q@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,cf8dab4065aa42a,start X-Google-Thread: 110f21,cf8dab4065aa42a,start X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,cf8dab4065aa42a,start X-Google-Thread: fca2b,cf8dab4065aa42a,start X-Google-Thread: 10e835,cf8dab4065aa42a,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid110f21,gid101eb4,gidfca2b,gid10e835,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: jay_stutz@yahoo.com Newsgroups: sci.econ,alt.politics.economics,fl.general,az.politics,chi.general Subject: Re: The House immigration bill will probably target businesses Date: 6 Dec 2005 13:41:17 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 107 Message-ID: <1133905277.438531.179650@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> References: <ncsbp1pct31a0tp7aa45qn6fqoehm6ka4q@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.42.84.22 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1133905282 11156 127.0.0.1 (6 Dec 2005 21:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:41:22 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <ncsbp1pct31a0tp7aa45qn6fqoehm6ka4q@4ax.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.42.84.22; posting-account=dOCG-A0AAAAHld3fkab_iD9VCLr-yPXR