🚀 go-pugleaf

SOMEBODY has a more elaborate and complete version of these thread and
others, I am writing some ten minutes out of a normal working day of
ten hours. I rely on those **elaborations** to find who was behind all
this havoc, as this is the main motivation for them to act. I should
be able to do this, right? But they can do it without question and
profit from it, right? There is no permission to use this materials
for profit without contacting me for permission and I dont have that
contact! I mean this instance of a man, not just any similar person,
to which effect I included a description of the lines of my hands... I
rely on those documents, in any form they take, to find the group of
schizophrenic thieves behind all the crimes I am still suffering,
including those who committed crimes on other criminals and other
victims. They all ralate to me in meaningful and evident laws of
character, style. Some MAY have my permission after all to use them,
but I am still an isolated prisoner of a life long _mafia_. That s
what they amount to, independently of how politically or
trascendentally they consider themselves. You ll see... in a market
economy setting, cooperation is also a tool, confrontation is
ritualized...

The otters have a cock (rooster), and he is working with the SWAT
team. It is the last finding in the game. Cock double meaning, rooster
in Mexican having the meaning of champion, the boys fight the cock to
defeat the otters and the cock ends up sided with the SWAT. Another
kidnapping takes effect. MAybe they should have used a bull, (guey or
vaco), but the gallo double meaning would be lost. ANd it is the
toughest enemy so far in the game. Funny enough the otters are very
recognizable in real life, as pikachu and machop (pokemon) are also.
You have to play with the girl character to find the boy character
prisoner, then as a lonely wolf, then losing the girl to another
planet (country, a country being the whole Earth in an interplanetary
fantasy). It is in the nature of schizophrenics to confess, not
understanding the channel leads to metaphor, schizos dont need to
confess, they accept the channel and, like homeless, discuss it
openly.

Looks to me this place is being cleaned up as well as possible; not
the first time I confront alcohol in the places I considered
suspicious of hiding the women who should be in my life and not mere
shadows...

Teenage smokers study found faulty. It doesnt consider hidden
schizophrenia. Indeed, given the fanatism against intoxication of all
kinds, any statement on the development of brain pathways under such
conditions has to consider the effect of the total sum of signals
reaching those brains. in other words, lots of people thinking of them
as smoking will have a more or less discernible effect in brain
development this study doesnt explain, though its findings very likely
are an expression of such problem.

Yo as a gender neutral particle. In Spanish it means **I**, the self.
It is such a common word that it would transmit regularly through
telepathy. Same principle applies: **I[bang]...** the last cry of
surprise before sudden death (crime) interrupting the phrase, then
taken as a name. So statements like **Yo looks like a freak**, should
be understood more like: **Joe, (he) looks like a freak**. The origin
of the name Joe. And there may be _some_ famous Joe in the channel, or
there was. Studying the social characteristics of the people who use
the particle would give some light as to who may have committed such
crimes, as it would propagate through the (associated) clines.

An unexpected consequence of the dynamic of telepathic throughput is
that of making women and children more prone to be victims of
schizophrenic crimes. What is first a broadband, reduces down to a
very narrow band, either individually in the transmitting brain or
socially as carrier fields move away. What is left is a set of
messages without voice envelope information. This lack of voice
envelope would both result in synthesize envelopes at the point of
reception, either the schizophrenic  or the anthena brain. Receptive
brains would add their own, known envelope (or acquire the real
envelope from nearby bystanders who do know the real voice) or it
would be reduced to the minimum expression of it, the voice of dumb
people or women; this interpretation would be provided by the
receptive brain at the time of reception. The overall effect will be
that of blaming women and children as the sources of the transmission.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore