🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2334

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2334
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:11
31 lines
4176 bytes
In the (a) model of telepathy the expected effect of introducing a
sex
word on girls should be that of effecting a partition, some subset of
girls being attracted by the telepath (or toward the talking head/
carrier field) and another subset going away from it. A third set
would remain in place. Mothers would follow girls in one case, not in
another. Graphically under conditions of uniformity it would produce
an expanding circle. This result ought to be automatic if a proper
model of man was programmed beforehand in the simulation.

In an (assumedly) normal dynamic, in terms of information there is at
first an accumulation of knowldege/information in the brain leading to
an expansion eventually exploding into a fully transmitting telepath.
[simple model of neural network (fixed architecture without growth)
model this dynamic as a progressive use of available nodes/connections
and increasing values toward threshold]. This catastrophic dynamic
gives the abovementioned dynamic of, first, a subset of entities
fleeing (opposition) and a group of entities being attracted directly
(straight trajectories), then a subset of entities following diverse
trajectories where the telepath acts as a center of accumulation. In
terms of females, the first informed females expect pregnancies, while
the latter subset of females waits to gather more information before
deciding on pregnancy, which determines also the social/psychological
motivation for several characteristic trajectories. Note that
depending on **density** several astray girls gravitate toward the
telepath to become pregnant then are delivered back (elliptic
trajectories) even if families may no longer be present, while others
return to steady family orbits around the central telepath. This is a
form of Sterens algorithm and also a social analogy to the Big Bang...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5235bd4a-a0c6-43ca-b9eb-388c639fd6b4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1190819027.048684.216300@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <9c59aeca_34f3-89b7$e61c$94b2241d4d28@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <2085f41b-4d19-40dc-a58d-246692800178@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <b358c7e8-3d30-4b16-bf22-1963b11a0e13@f10g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <788efd8c-3986-4ce5-a760-dc4ca6053135@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <b366ea8f-9875-44ff-89ee-9232be115091@v46g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1b1019e4-f037-4829-bfdb-535fb124d52e@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <e29a344d-7230-4b14-a838-d04eef8780f1@q21g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <2b8a301a-e843-41d7-938d-411ce1f5d891@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <0fe7f18b-b048-461c-bc69-ce43f029ff94@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <633c96fe-9e87-4cd1-a3a2-2690fc4014b2@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <05b388b8-e1df-416b-a6f1-bcd5ea92f38e@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsignore@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ, sci.physics, ny.general, dc.general, seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <5235bd4a-a0c6-43ca-b9eb-388c639fd6b4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
References: <1190819027.048684.216300@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> 
 <9c59aeca_34f3-89b7$e61c$94b2241d4d28@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <2085f41b-4d19-40dc-a58d-246692800178@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <b358c7e8-3d30-4b16-bf22-1963b11a0e13@f10g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <788efd8c-3986-4ce5-a760-dc4ca6053135@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <b366ea8f-9875-44ff-89ee-9232be115091@v46g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
 <1b1019e4-f037-4829-bfdb-535fb124d52e@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <e29a344d-7230-4b14-a838-d04eef8780f1@q21g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
 <2b8a301a-e843-41d7-938d-411ce1f5d891@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <0fe7f18b-b048-461c-bc69-ce43f029ff94@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <633c96fe-9e87-4cd1-a3a2-2690fc4014b2@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
 <05b388b8-e1df-416b-a6f1-bcd5ea92f38e@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.107.229.140
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1201903926 26028 127.0.0.1 (1 Feb 2008 22:12:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.107.229.140; 
 posting-account=x4Jy6goAAAB5L7VIUhpIrQkogZRVetIP
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; 
 .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)