Article View: sci.econ
Article #2404Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:56
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:56
88 lines
7648 bytes
7648 bytes
They lost control because there were too many variable or too many equations. It can be seen as a system of equations, each double entendre establishing one equation: d = D o L o B l = D o L o B b = D o L o B D, L and B are clines (last names), the system tries to establish a particular instance d, l or b. o is an operation. They original system is a postulated axiom, like d = D + L - B or L = D - L + B. The level of abstraction is high, this is only an approximation. Seen this way this system would establish particular identities. We can add an F term and another equation for friends. But the system was turned self conscious and other variables have to be added. The fixed term is supposed to be formed by standard social groups, in this case homelesses, the police, churches... Any one of these may be taken as a new variable and determined within the system, except that also schizophrenics and telepaths were including as an equation, say, p = S + T; the problem was not only to partition the clines and distinguish particular Ds, Ls or Bs, but also to , so now we have some equation such as d = D o L o B o F o P o H o C o G o... the fixed terms is expanded, it requires new equations to determine particular values, there may be more than one solution, there is no guarantee that it is not indeterminate, but some variables cant be determined within the original idea for the system! Students and musicians wer also included and I dont know **exactly** who else, because of the equation P = S + T. Actually that equation would be traditional, what I propose is that it is more complex and P cannot only be partition in S + T but includes several combinations. So to cure schizophrenias genocide is not a real option, the system is too complex even to be solved iteratively in an optimum way. Which means I am still isolated with no contacts, not to mention that I still cant speak with the people I want and cant yet fathom the appearance of the clines... No, no, no, I can see the problem, posts by a single individual or by more than one, the consequences I dont fully understand for each case. It is obvious that the **solution** is _meant_ NOT to recognize an intelligence but spread it out. In this case it means very harsh conditions for me AND I did have **some** problem with being robbed too often. Now that I am being harassed through radio also! I am not sure if I should call them commercial fifth grade musicians or superschizophrenics passing their leads as some have been useful feedback or they may br their own messages. The fact is that I suspect of the Morton Williams on 57th, the building above. I The issue is that I think the real BonsignorAs were **sacrificed** and their place taken by identity impersonators from some three decades ago, so there is a double set of Bonsignori, the false ones taking advantage of the REAL name even after it may have been changed by some of them AND the real ones being covered by them. The problem is still that mechanism of double entendre and its structure, annealing, were _somebody_ is pushed UP and somebody is hidden, then resources are **distributed** and the person UP is then **sacrificed** after clearing the **in between**, leaving nobody but the managers. REAL problem is it seems some of this people get their drugs hidden INSIDE a woman, the coprofagous ones taking advantage of the delivery method and then the woman is lost. This time I am not sure if it involved women _I_ know. Again the problem is compound by external constraints coming from religion and a set of axioms and deductions and assumptions that manifest as PSYCHOSIS. So I am alone and suddenly because of theft I find myself in opposition to one Lu is, seven or eight Lu is es, their fathers, the real fathers, my girlfriend, her family, her real family, THEIR real family, the girls, the false fathers of the girls and the true fathers of all these people PLUS the load of thieves, and assorted characters, all of them entangled while somebody was changing contents in my domain and I was complaining for not getting my emails, then fighting for some people NOT to go to jail and be separated from real criminals. I think Luison was in touch with Cardenas from before he reappeared in 2001. He became relevant because of the job I left. Then Home for All became relevant... and it was when I was made to lose control. Actually I suspect both Cardenas and Diaz (Ordaz) were involved under the usual trick of announcing a false death... or the death of a cline member or twin... to please religious considerations and constraints... because of some of the mechanisms I am still exposing... While I do have issues I expected to deal with in court, and of course I still expect to recover my **products** (dont confuse them with the idea of a tortured person as a product), and to send some people to jail because of some photos, maybe take out of jail some people as they were victimized in ways I can expose, entramped in characteristic ways (incrimination **theory**, police indifference, brotherhoods...) and of course disentangle the knot of children. Funny that I cant be as explicit as I want here. Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1190120194.113392.169090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1188580723.687949.278680@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <1188773377.973722.186500@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1188882196.694220.219700@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1189063983.596491.103850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189124963.837375.69850@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189143446.548861.221230@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189148575.324214.185580@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189190775.402280.217790@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189211333.922738.23420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1189345859.092914.281730@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189877668.130999.257010@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189913984.324576.73680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1190048586.721163.246350@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190084090.674480.123070@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032 X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032 X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsignore@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:56:34 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 89 Message-ID: <1190120194.113392.169090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <1188580723.687949.278680@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <1188773377.973722.186500@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1188882196.694220.219700@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1189063983.596491.103850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189124963.837375.69850@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189143446.548861.221230@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189148575.324214.185580@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189190775.402280.217790@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189211333.922738.23420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1189345859.092914.281730@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189877668.130999.257010@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189913984.324576.73680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1190048586.721163.246350@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190084090.674480.123070@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.196.0.50 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190120194 27927 127.0.0.1 (18 Sep 2007 12:56:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:56:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/522.11.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.3 Safari/522.12.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.196.0.50; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0