Article View: sci.econ
Article #2406Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:22
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:22
128 lines
9574 bytes
9574 bytes
She was with a schizophrenic, like Lu is when he said to me **you are clever**, speaking of me, and it was inaccurate. She was oblivious, but _he_ was hearing through her the bounced signal. It would come out with her voice! It was not a strong signal. So that signal wanted her tortured... with her voice. The schizophrenic complied. This would happen to ALL Belindas! I would get the same signal at the time, except I couldnt hear it... So she was changed and that signal came from the real torturer and manager. Now it happens I dont know who was there before I arrived, but I realize that it was somebody who would SWEAR I was schizophrenic and made my life an almost impossibility for several years. A psycho telepath who knew the Belindas before I did, before I even imagined there could be several Belindas. I can think of Dr Luna as one obvious source, child psychologists can be VERY dangerous! But most likely it was the **uncles** from the provincial town, and her cousins. It was them who wanted them tortured! They were already Sterens, at least some of them, that is, mixed families with no kin relationship, now I come to identify as the by product of Muslim indirect (telepathic, schizophrenic) influence. It is that group of men, the one behind them as **family** and the schizophrenics who associated themselves to them who tortured some of them, THEN all of them jumped against me when this would be exposed, and ended up lobotomizing some of them and losing my children to I still dont know who, though some answers I may still get from NYU. The tp, c model can be applied, now p is belinda and c is couple. We assume an unordered pair (b, c), the directive being torture. I consider the possibility that some of them were more sick than others, so a simple directive like **tie me up** (atame, like in Almodovar) turned into several actions. THAT it knew of my music and established the whole mafia, maybe an old man by now? Bearded, white hair, short, fat, looking severe and angry, short neck and his associated cline? And THAT influence is STILL around. Of course I think or Rincon, the main issue being that in thirty years he didnt reappear AT ALL, for no motive, even if around 1996 he was somewhere nearby and I was already a grown up man. It is that group of men I want uniquely identified and punished formally, independently of how famous they may be or how respectable they pretend to be. Even more because I saw the results of their actions, my being homeless now and what they did to the candidate children. Most annoying is the pantomime or reality that their hands were cut off, as per Muslim law for some unnamed and unjudged crime but considered unquestionable. Incidentally, the **principle** that punishment can be forfeited if consequences of acts are disastrous does speak of such inquisitions and their executions (Beteta). Though by now the problem is compound with the, again, schizophrenic problem of identity this people exhibit so openly by changing their physiognomy, name and identity so uncontrollable. In the above system we can establish an equation b = B, It would mean that it was the Belindas who were self selecting! That such a complex system would be simplified is another way to expose a possible genocide, though in the implied algebra all schizophrenic operations have to be included, transexualism and torture being two of them. It is interesting that a cline can actually determine itself and reduce an equation like x = X down to x = x0 by the act of murder. Renaming is implied though insufficient, it would only tag elements within the cline while other operations change the definition of the cline (mimetism, metamorphism). Note also that if pressure is establish in the system (by some additional equation), then ONLY a travesti would satisfy all equations (in the first approach) and lead a unique value! In fact, the matter is whether such systems can be established such that several ordered solutions can be found as a necessity, that is, more than one trio of D, L and B appear such that all Ds, Ls and Bs are PER FORCE satisfying the system. This is equivalent to solving the whole humanity and determining parallel realities are a necessity compared to a purposeful pressure to establish such parallel lives. An equivalent statement is to prove that a telepathic-schizophrenic social model for a given model of man would lead to parallel multiple solutions to some universal system of equations for the equivalent of a human relationships algebra and that that solution is necessary and unique. It is equivalent to establishing an optimum model of human relationships valid for all humanity. Such a task is what Churches pretend to have accomplished, as well as historical systems like Feudalism, Empire and Occident. This task implies both empiric and historical research as well as theoretical definitions for the elements implied. A proof of nonexistence would be important for formal reasons, as it would mean that establishing such systems is in itself an act of imposition. So, for instance, if the police establishes a system of social relationships called investigation, that system would in itself prove the hypothesis, it would be a tautology rendering some legal problems unsolvable. If the only way to prove some hypothesis is by FORCING such conditions, the whole exercise is useless! This is the principle of no entrampment. People implied only by the definition of the cline would be suffering an external imposition rendering impossible their freedom. [Note that biological love would be an important operation leading to parallel realities, all Ds in love with all Bs, then the necessity to keep those realities separated (countries), but also the need to forcefully reproduce them]. The problem is important as it is the difference between animality and human freedom and points to the development and solution to several problems, like , but also to to creative possibilities more or less identifiable as social engineering, neurolinguistic programming and market incentives. I bet this people can ONLY hear me HERE in this place, but not in the coffeeshop. Then we have a structure as an umbrella, telepath fields under that particular field would connect to some set of schizo(phrenic)s and the telepath heard the message with the voice of the field. This comes from my private group in this server. I couldnt open the account where people ask to be members. Of course, would mean some money to me... This may be claimed by somebody else if they have access to the server from the server. THey would be associated to some Belinda of the same phenotype... The conclusion I want somebody to accept is that these people associated themeselves to these women so that I would have a claim against them, then they can claim that it is because I want to steal these ideas... Three years after is a long time to change many things whil I remain the same. A whole evening developing these ideas in my mind... it is tiresome to rewrite what could be written in time if things were normal. Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1190262126.382549.18800@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1188882196.694220.219700@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1189063983.596491.103850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189124963.837375.69850@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189143446.548861.221230@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189148575.324214.185580@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189190775.402280.217790@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189211333.922738.23420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1189345859.092914.281730@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189877668.130999.257010@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189913984.324576.73680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1190048586.721163.246350@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190084090.674480.123070@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190120194.113392.169090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1190120641.478311.209600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032 X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032 X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsignore@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:22:06 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 129 Message-ID: <1190262126.382549.18800@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> References: <1188882196.694220.219700@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1189063983.596491.103850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189124963.837375.69850@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189143446.548861.221230@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189148575.324214.185580@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189190775.402280.217790@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189211333.922738.23420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1189345859.092914.281730@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189877668.130999.257010@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189913984.324576.73680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1190048586.721163.246350@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190084090.674480.123070@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190120194.113392.169090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1190120641.478311.209600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.23.216.73 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190262126 28809 127.0.0.1 (20 Sep 2007 04:22:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:22:06 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1190120641.478311.209600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; NN5.1.2.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.23.216.73; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0