🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2406

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2406
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:22
128 lines
9574 bytes
She was with a schizophrenic, like Lu is when he said to me **you are
clever**, speaking of me, and it was inaccurate. She was oblivious,
but _he_ was hearing
through her the bounced signal. It would come out with her voice! It
was not a strong signal. So that signal wanted her tortured... with
her voice. The schizophrenic complied. This would happen to ALL
Belindas! I would get the same signal at the time, except I couldnt
hear it... So she was changed and that signal came from the real
torturer and manager. Now it happens I dont know who was there before
I arrived, but I realize that it was somebody who would SWEAR I was
schizophrenic and made my life an almost impossibility for several
years. A psycho telepath who knew the Belindas before I did, before I
even imagined there could be several Belindas.  I can think of Dr
Luna
as one obvious source, child psychologists can be VERY dangerous! But
most likely it was the **uncles** from the provincial town, and her
cousins. It was them who wanted them tortured! They were already
Sterens, at least some of them, that is, mixed families with no kin
relationship, now I come to identify as the by product of Muslim
indirect (telepathic, schizophrenic) influence. It is that group of
men, the one behind them as **family** and the schizophrenics who
associated themselves to them who tortured some of them, THEN all of
them jumped against me when this would be exposed, and ended up
lobotomizing some of them and losing my children to I still dont know
who, though some answers I may still get from NYU. The tp, c model
can
be applied, now p is belinda and c is couple. We assume an unordered
pair (b, c), the directive being torture. I consider the possibility
that some of them were more sick than others, so a simple directive
like **tie me up** (atame, like in Almodovar) turned into several
actions. THAT it knew of my music and established the whole mafia,
maybe an old man by now? Bearded, white hair, short, fat, looking
severe and angry, short neck and his associated cline? And THAT
influence is STILL around. Of course I think or Rincon, the main
issue
being that in thirty years he didnt reappear AT ALL, for no motive,
even if around 1996 he was somewhere nearby and I was already a grown
up man. It is that group of men I want uniquely identified and
punished formally, independently of how famous they may be or how
respectable they pretend to be. Even more because I saw the results
of
their actions, my being homeless now and what they did to the
candidate children. Most annoying is the pantomime or reality that
their hands were cut off, as per Muslim law for some unnamed and
unjudged crime but considered unquestionable. Incidentally, the
**principle** that punishment can be forfeited if consequences of
acts
are disastrous does speak of such inquisitions and their executions
(Beteta). Though by now the problem is compound with the, again,
schizophrenic problem of identity this people exhibit so openly by
changing their physiognomy, name and identity so uncontrollable.

In the above system we can establish an equation b = B, It would mean
that it was the Belindas who were self selecting! That such a complex
system would be simplified is another way to expose a possible
genocide, though in the implied algebra all schizophrenic operations
have to be included, transexualism and torture being two of them. It
is interesting that a cline can actually determine itself and reduce
an equation like x = X down to x = x0 by the act of murder. Renaming
is implied though insufficient, it would only tag elements within the
cline while other operations change the definition of the cline
(mimetism, metamorphism). Note also that if pressure is establish in
the system (by some additional equation), then ONLY a travesti would
satisfy all equations (in the first approach) and lead a unique
value!
In fact, the matter is whether such systems can be established such
that several ordered solutions can be found as a necessity, that is,
more than one trio of D, L and B appear such that all Ds, Ls and Bs
are PER FORCE satisfying the system. This is equivalent to solving
the
whole humanity and determining parallel realities are a necessity
compared to a purposeful pressure to establish such parallel lives.
An
equivalent statement is to prove that a telepathic-schizophrenic
social model for a given model of man would lead to parallel multiple
solutions to some universal system of equations for the equivalent of
a human relationships algebra and that that solution is necessary and
unique. It is equivalent to establishing an optimum model of human
relationships valid for all humanity. Such a task is what Churches
pretend to have accomplished, as well as historical systems like
Feudalism, Empire and Occident. This task implies both empiric and
historical research as well as theoretical definitions for the
elements implied. A proof of nonexistence would be important for
formal reasons, as it would mean that establishing such systems is in
itself an act of imposition. So, for instance, if the police
establishes a system of social relationships called investigation,
that system would in itself prove the hypothesis, it would be a
tautology rendering some legal problems unsolvable. If the only way
to
prove some hypothesis is by FORCING such conditions, the whole
exercise is useless! This is the principle of no entrampment. People
implied only by the definition of the cline would be suffering an
external imposition rendering impossible their freedom. [Note that
biological love would be an important operation leading to parallel
realities, all Ds in love with all Bs, then the necessity to keep
those realities separated (countries), but also the need to
forcefully
reproduce them]. The problem is important as it is the difference
between animality and human freedom and points to the development and
solution to several problems, like , but also to to creative
possibilities more or less identifiable as social engineering,
neurolinguistic programming and market incentives.

I bet this people can ONLY hear me HERE in this place, but not in the
coffeeshop. Then we have a structure as an umbrella, telepath fields
under
that particular field would connect to some set of schizo(phrenic)s
and the telepath heard the message with the voice of the field.

This comes from my private group in this server. I couldnt open the
account
where people ask to be members. Of course, would mean some money to
me...
This may be claimed by somebody else if they have access to the server
from the server.
THey would be associated to some Belinda of the same phenotype...
The conclusion I want somebody to accept is that these people
associated
themeselves to these women so that I would have a claim against them,
then they can claim that it is because I want to steal these ideas...
Three years after is a long time to change many things whil I remain
the same.

A whole evening developing these ideas in my mind... it is tiresome to
rewrite
what could be written in time if things were normal.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1190262126.382549.18800@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1188882196.694220.219700@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1189063983.596491.103850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189124963.837375.69850@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1189143446.548861.221230@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189148575.324214.185580@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1189190775.402280.217790@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189211333.922738.23420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1189345859.092914.281730@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189877668.130999.257010@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1189913984.324576.73680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1190048586.721163.246350@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190084090.674480.123070@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190120194.113392.169090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1190120641.478311.209600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsignore@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:22:06 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 129
Message-ID: <1190262126.382549.18800@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
References: <1188882196.694220.219700@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <1189063983.596491.103850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1189124963.837375.69850@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1189143446.548861.221230@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1189148575.324214.185580@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1189190775.402280.217790@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1189211333.922738.23420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
   <1189345859.092914.281730@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1189877668.130999.257010@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1189913984.324576.73680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1190048586.721163.246350@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <1190084090.674480.123070@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1190085357.886508.197710@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1190120194.113392.169090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1190120641.478311.209600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.23.216.73
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190262126 28809 127.0.0.1 (20 Sep 2007 04:22:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:22:06 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1190120641.478311.209600@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; NN5.1.2.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.23.216.73;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0