🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 25, 3:02 pm, Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsign...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> wrote:> The fixed relationships constraint can be defeated by using the
> > Sterens algorithm, as long as enforcers cant discern the difference
> > between the people concerned. This way a single male can enjoy several
.
> (snip)
> [this means Catholic type marriages]
.
> > pressure of the enforcers s psychosis. For one, the woman is
> > **rationally** murdered to avoid being __discovered__ (deep meaning
> > here), while for the other the woman is **rationally** murdered as she
> > broke the law OR she MAY break the fixed relationships law... (much
> > more to follow here in this subtheme).

[The Sterens algorythm] affects economic reality when taking into
account that fortune heirs are not the real biological heirs but
belong to just any family... ...then if descendants are recognized
fortunes are split in ways unintended by the wealthy father. Part of
thise fortune, if not all of it, ends up in the hands of the managers
of the families. Several, several crisis and pressures can be expected
from the existence of unrecognized heirs and around their
recognition...

The Greek chorus in ancient greek mythology has its origin in the
phenomenon of bounding signals. As telepathy works through pattern
matching, the transmitting person will bounce its signal on those
(insulated) brains matching _partially_ the transmitters current
throughts. By observers it will sound as if there are SEVERAL
synchronized minds expresing the same thought, drones as it seems.
This may happen independently of the transmitter, as the transmitter
itself may be the target of a bounced signal, this becoming even truer
if that target is also a carrier field. So, for instance we have:

T ---m--\  CF ---mp----\ [N1,N2,N3,...] /----- S

where T is the source telepath, m is the message, CF is the carrier
field telepath targeted by m, p is the (people addressing) pattern
being matched implicitly, N1... are normal people whose brains match
the key p and S is the schizo observer. S will have the impresson that
n people are delivering (maybe to him personally) the message m, but
in fact it is T who is manipulating S through CF (considering that N
may be totally unaware of the phenomenon, its only function being that
of matching and rejecting the transmission mp). As message me will
include enough information to at least trigger the synthesis of a
voice, the pattern matched by N will include _some_ voice pitch being
oberved by S. This would distinguish between bounced signals (on N)
from repeated signals by some N being actually T themselves...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore