🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2468

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2468
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:13
70 lines
6496 bytes
On May 28, 4:18 pm, Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsign...@gmail.com>
wrote:
(snip)
> [Our relationship was then brutalized when we didnt do it from
> behind... that is, it was not anal sex, but the zealous schizophrenics
> managing our lives against our will wouldnt go as far as to ask, they
The same imbecile schizophrenics, SENTENCE meant a sentence in the I
CHING, the judgement they speak of was a I CHING JUDGEMENT, not a
trial, la sentencia, the sentence, translated as the Judgement, el
juicio, but not judicial trial, the judegement in a I ching hexagram,
maybe 18, 45 or 46. It was a BAD translation. It supports what I said:
schizophrenia is a problem of information processing where the brain
cannot cope with the excess of additional information adequately and
it leads to a contradiction, likfe contradiction.

It is an inverse selection what Churches have, a selection away from
intelligent behaviour toward primitive, antibiological behaviour. To
go against nature doesnt mean to be more human, it degenerates into
reptile. Handsome and intelligent people are pressed in such a way
that selection is against them, leaving less genes with those
characteristics in the genetic pool. This is the effect of the
prohibitions and bans of Church and the prejudices (action rules) of
schizophrenics. The more attractive, the more some individual can be
confused (purposefully) with anyone of several Church archtypes, from
the saint to the devil, all of them to be avoided, as opposed to the
good archtypes, where sex is anathema and the person is as inoffensive
as a plant. This may be an obvious stratagem to some, but the effect
is then to turn into passivity who would otherwise be active, as
activity will be seen as threatening by the schizophrenic and church
schizophrenic believer. Direct access to some of the deeper areas of
the brain, down from the neocortex into the autonomous system may be
the reason why so rpimitive behaviours become most relevant as
decision rules.

Like a radio tuned to one station but making anthena, schizophrenics
can see the transmissions around the on radio and they confuse it with
a transmitting station. THey want the station to transmit, all they do
is turn off a normal radio! These people will think a dead brain is
just asleep or the person was turned dumb or in coma when the person
is actually dead. This would be also the problem with foetuses,
telepathic schizophrenics would think the fetus is speaking,
intelligent, iluminated, a telepath, sainctly, etc, when in fact it is
just a being (embriologically) evolving. This possibility may lie in
the core of some discussions against abortion, as schizophrenics would
bet anything that the evolving embryo, even in the fish stages, is
actually a human being. This also leads to the medieval theory of the
homunuculus, or that human beings are contained in sperm as minuscule
replicas of grown up beings. Obviously trying to detect a telepath at
that stage of development is impossible, language is not yet available
(though may be in the process of being primed layer by layer), but of
course this has to be taught to schizophrenics so that they dont act
based on that input.

N ---\  Cm1m2m3m4... --\ WT ---\ Km2m3 ---\ S

N is a normal person speaking through walkie talkie person WT. The
message is m1m2m3m4... withing context C. Because of the effects of
attention, schizo receptor S will get the message m2m3 THEN he will
assume it is withing context K. K may be totally unrelated to C but
the common symbols m2m3, meaningful in both context, will make C=K so
m2m3 is adequate input for some action. m1 and m4 are lost in the
transmission unless S is totally devoted to receiving transmissions.
Not considering this m1 and m4 elements of the message as being lost
will lead the S to be more and more out of tune with the real basic
context of C, so C and K will diverge. By the time S manages to find N
or WT, the worldviews of both persons will be so different that
communication would be impossible. N and Wt may not be aware at all of
S...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1180394023.809755.140770@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1178676029.221317.293300@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1178930454.735378.246430@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1179110978.332021.243660@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1179193815.068143.303070@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1179420592.371718.173330@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1179426548.406625.125720@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1179448257.468829.150950@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1179619227.842969.262240@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1179678132.712564.77630@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1179876507.952912.321150@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <1180128998.709387.134620@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <1180131665.458155.96880@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1180208220.386190.15150@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <1180286655.608476.144770@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1180383535.180238.157560@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsignore@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
Date: 28 May 2007 16:13:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <1180394023.809755.140770@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1178676029.221317.293300@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <1178930454.735378.246430@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1179110978.332021.243660@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1179193815.068143.303070@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <1179420592.371718.173330@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <1179426548.406625.125720@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1179448257.468829.150950@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1179619227.842969.262240@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1179678132.712564.77630@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <1179876507.952912.321150@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
   <1180128998.709387.134620@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
   <1180131665.458155.96880@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1180208220.386190.15150@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
   <1180286655.608476.144770@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1180383535.180238.157560@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.196.0.50
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1180394024 26777 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2007 23:13:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:13:44 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1180383535.180238.157560@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/419 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.196.0.50;
   posting-account=n9LfjQ0AAADUAsm85Yd27wTgCz9kLl7T