🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2476

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2476
From: djbonsignore
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:50
130 lines
10180 bytes
It is in raps, three millions per loonie, but they dont define what is
a loonie. They were actig like loonies and I still wonder who was in
between. I cant get a bureaucracy understand my special needs to be
sure. It is the key problem: the house has everything but you dont
have the key. Or you have the key, but a guard doesnt let you approach
the door. I didnt want to mix companies here, this thread had a
different purpose, but it has to have laboratories or an internal
clinic. Homeless, real homeless, seem to have a real PASSWORD to close
areas in the Grand Central Terminal. He was outside then he was in the
inside in no time, a very filthy one. They know it is very confusing.
I dont know who may be offering such quantities, but if it was HEARD
through through the hidden channel it is MOST LIKELY an EMPTY OFFER. I
just heard it, I dont know who else links it to these threads and the
issue of my hard drive.

Nobody can tell me what happened nor where they are. It no longer
feels like a game. I dont have a contract, the one I signed years ago
was for a company that no longer exists and it wouldnt cover my code,
though people using my code would not know exactly what I claim as
mine and what I dont, and only I can know for all purposes.

Schizophrenia opposed to being schizo works through silence vows. If
it cant be communicated it is easier to go destabilized. Some tortures
and torturers (criminals) would have as a goal to force this silence
vows. Allowing for fear as the origin of schizophrenia, pain would be
the reinforcer to assure the silence vow that a system (Church) needs
to have people go into psychosis (external clasp, the cycle would be
the obsession with revealing/not revealing the content of voices).
Psychiatric treatment acts precisely by letting the person _speak_ and
eventually reveal the schizophrenic contradiction, then give the
necessary permissions (undo the clasps) to let the person out of the
obsession cycle. Normal people are spotted precisely because they dont
fall into contradiction after some time outpouring mind contents.
Obviously a therapist with knowledge of current discussions/cultures
would have the advantage if he himself managed to find the implied
internal contradictions (selfpsychoanalysis) and directs the monologue
to find them and solve. It would relieve the (excess) information
pressure and give arguments to answer issues conveniently. Here is
important to define schizophrenia in terms of contradiction, as it
allows the therapy and handling of dysfunctions that dont originate on
hearing voices in the internal mind, for instance, by internalizing
arguments heard _through_ schizophrenics. External clasps pose other
problems, as the external influence may need more resources to be
assimilated, exposed and handled than what a therapist can command
(police, information).

Church confession in terms of crime control work only if the confessor
is considered sacred, that is, beyond any crime or criminal intention!
To heterosexual people it would mean that there is no jealousy or
sexual pressure implied. Homosexuality is then essential for the
schemes to work, particularly if homosexuality is not allowed as it
will be considered nonexistent and impractical by consensus. A
homosexual would not contend in sexual confessions. This is one of the
goals of the Sterens eugenesic algorithm, to prepare enough
homosexuals and **sacred** men to church purposes. Children are
prepared to become homosexuals, sexually passive (beta males), for
later church life AND to keep homosexuality urges controlled!
Homosexuality is then of such importance to grant power to clergymen
without emperiling women (ownerships) that **traditional** recipes to
atenuate maleness and increase the femaleness of clergymen wil make
use ALSO of the **excess** women left behind by the algorithm. Since a
ban on intoxication means necessarily the need to go through non toxic
substances, homeopathy, the principle of similars curing similars,
suggests the use of cannibalism, this **ritual** is also implied in
the full use of the Sterens eugenesic algorithm. This would be tha
religious but totally unncessary basis to sacrifice women, that of
using bioproducts to help homosexuality, transexuality and sexual
passivity ni clergymen and other **sacred** men. In terms of that
algorithm it would be those who didnt have children (considered
probably as more male than female) the candidates to become human prey
and go into the human body produce schemes. This is why I am still
very worried, I lack that information and cant get by myself.

...Extortion also works without implying telepathy just by assuming a
partially private (or public) channel. This would have the origin of
the expression blackmail, in times when writing was considered an
exclusive learning, letters with confession would pass between wise
men without considering messengers could also read and publicize
content! This secret readers would have to black-mail whoever
confesses a crime! Ir is considered as confessing if the letter
includes a story. This learned ability was common in the Church and
uncommon in secular people, one reason why as people become more
learned, Church (confession, schizophrenic extortion) diminished
church power while at the same time making it go more concentrated in
the Inquisition. Inquisition makes sense as people would not confess
their crimes in telepathic schizophrenia, making clergymen be more
_strict_ to make them distinguish between real crimes and imaginary
(but received by clergymen) confessions!

I think he can be my uncle or second uncle, through a common mother s
grandmother. I still remember she would speak of me implying a third
person, but following the operation of substitution, she would be
getting information about me from the real grandmother, her sister or
half sister. It would bring up the filial relation to great
grandmother. I am sure that line I have it right, as the (dispersed)
algorithm leaves mothers with real sons, (no incest) and fathers with
changed daughters, though in this case my aunt would have been the
target to incest pressure, leaving my mother as the conflicting
daughter, the one that leaves house and forms (or doest form) a new
family, even if in my case because of the two countries involved she
would go back to form a non standar family **lump**. My  point of
reference is still that I know for sure I am producing this works, so
the point of the algorithm is either to reproduce the ability OR not
to reproduce it!

I suspect other people I was mentioned also belong in the tree but I
lack information. I think it includes the guy of the bodies
exposition, where my other uncle can be seen posing as football
player. I saw him in (cable?) TV in the shelter doing corpses
sculpture. He is implied three times. I think he is the surgeon...
They may still be confusing me and they may not know who belong to the
family of Belinda.

Godly? Why rely on people? Because of efficiency constraints. You
would need to concentrate a lot of energy in a smal space and time to
teleport somebody from any place on Earth to this place. Energy not
only in watts but also in information content. It can be done but it
would take a lot of time to gather the necessary information and build
the technology. I dont think the human brain contains enough power to
do it, though it is a risky assertion, the search space is infinite to
find such a brain configuration to perform the feat in pure
biotechnology.

Omaha and Smolensk, I cant be the only one. They are train stations in
an old game.

Waste has a different meaning in Spanish than that of kill in English.
It means (to) refuse, not to use.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1179193815.068143.303070@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1177503081.516068.109080@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <phineaspuddleduck-D7885F.21034326042007@news.octanews.com> <1177635889.258294.52360@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1177733355.938663.228150@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177772628.118389.325920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177854790.973683.215260@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177856891.631832.325500@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1177870631.459700.132920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177976586.029663.269610@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1178296028.000282.19520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <1178483950.943633.67750@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1178599492.380352.238820@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1178676029.221317.293300@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1178930454.735378.246430@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1179110978.332021.243660@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: djbonsignore@gmail.com
Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
Date: 14 May 2007 18:50:15 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 131
Message-ID: <1179193815.068143.303070@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1177503081.516068.109080@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
   <phineaspuddleduck-D7885F.21034326042007@news.octanews.com>
   <1177635889.258294.52360@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177733355.938663.228150@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177772628.118389.325920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177854790.973683.215260@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177856891.631832.325500@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1177870631.459700.132920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177976586.029663.269610@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1178296028.000282.19520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
   <1178483950.943633.67750@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1178599492.380352.238820@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1178676029.221317.293300@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <1178930454.735378.246430@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1179110978.332021.243660@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.196.0.50
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1179193815 10600 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2007 01:50:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:50:15 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1179110978.332021.243660@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/419 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.196.0.50;
   posting-account=n9LfjQ0AAADUAsm85Yd27wTgCz9kLl7T