🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2497

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2497
From: djbonsignore
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:09
53 lines
5503 bytes
I am still shocked, my current account dissapeared, the new one is
already discovered by them, I went through another show in a shelter,
I had to call an ambulance to clear the door from this people, but in
a closed out of order bathroom there was the clear sound of thud of
something being dropped like a body. It came from who know, Sanitation
or maybe a parking lot behind. In all respects I am still
incommunicated even if I know my material is being used to justify
funds that should have come my way and not somebody else.

They are acting as seven years old or maybe eight years old. I would
hide from my family in the apartments by walking behind them
pretending they didnt know I was there. It is EXACTLY what all these
have been cowardly doing. I can detect a form of shallow psychosis, a
smenatic dysfunction in which verbal forming areas of the brain do
have what can be considered an extension into other, conceptual
forming, areas of the brain. Instead of delivering verbal messages
face to face, the message takes a different, object form, EXCLUSIVELY.
A metaphorical one at most. This creates for the victim (I) an
environment charged with too much meaning as it has to be interpreted
and there are several possibilities...

I think what they have is opium fumatoria. It was one of the bad
convincings in LA, that they didnt have hands nor feet, but where
somehow floating... it was supposed to  be UFOs so I would follow the
leads and end up in contact. This way it makes a lot more sense. The
scheme is almost perfect, because of the prohibition of intoxication
in the Quran. So there is an incentive to sell drugs and then
sacrifice those who use them! After all, they are violating a rule, so
they can somehow be saved for the afterlife by being sacrificed
violently, since in the judegement they would deserve smal punishment.
In real terms this is a very limited desert oriented ideology where
intoxication leads to death as it is a harsh environment. Those
intoxicated get quick punishment. This links to the marriage rule in
that its intention would then be to keep population constant in a
scarce resources setting, particularly under its catholic form of
single marriage. It means that real drug dealers are not found because
again they are pious men, and they are free to sacrifice people to
their convenience! Scapegoatism. In my case I was considered a drug
dealer and that s why my relationships were being so difficult: I was
supposed to sacrifice them but somebody else was doing it instead of
me! I was oblivious, but then it would match the whole pattern AND
justify my having relationships under their rule, particularly since
my basic family was composed by six people and would attract
attention. Humanly speaking, these rules are wrong under a different
technological level and different environments.

Again should come a long post here, but I have very little incentive,
even if they already know my arguments and what I am supposed to
publish here today. By now my name should command a lot of respect and
offers but all I get is a diffused celebrity while none of my basic
problems solves itself, but compounds.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1178294940.962300.217210@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <jbOWh.115563$aG1.37696@pd7urf3no> <1hwzp4c.ljjctb1xo3uteN%peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk> <1177371127.253381.213270@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <CybXh.119801$DE1.104831@pd7urf2no> <1177413185.222183.318680@n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1177503081.516068.109080@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <phineaspuddleduck-D7885F.21034326042007@news.octanews.com> <1177635889.258294.52360@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1177733355.938663.228150@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177772628.118389.325920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177854790.973683.215260@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177856891.631832.325500@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1177870631.459700.132920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177976586.029663.269610@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: djbonsignore@gmail.com
Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
Date: 4 May 2007 09:09:01 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <1178294940.962300.217210@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
   <jbOWh.115563$aG1.37696@pd7urf3no>
   <1hwzp4c.ljjctb1xo3uteN%peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk>
   <1177371127.253381.213270@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <CybXh.119801$DE1.104831@pd7urf2no>
   <1177413185.222183.318680@n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
   <1177503081.516068.109080@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
   <phineaspuddleduck-D7885F.21034326042007@news.octanews.com>
   <1177635889.258294.52360@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177733355.938663.228150@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177772628.118389.325920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177854790.973683.215260@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177856891.631832.325500@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <1177870631.459700.132920@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1177976586.029663.269610@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 17.255.240.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178294941 21378 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2007 16:09:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:09:01 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1177976586.029663.269610@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/419 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=17.255.240.2;
   posting-account=n9LfjQ0AAADUAsm85Yd27wTgCz9kLl7T