🚀 go-pugleaf

Found a foundation 2005 with the name of one of my files, a very
eincomplete one with a few turns, kind of jazzy. That foundation has
no contact... I dont believe in coincidences, rather, the point is
lost if the theft is not made evident somehow, that is, the real owner
has to be covered so that he cant speak of him, his works without
coinciding with some obvious external fact. That way they can
**prove** the primary author is secondary! An objective and impartial
investigation can show this, as the real primary author can create
such set of facts that the investigation can find the underlying
intersecting sect of interconnected people taking advantage of the
works of the primary author. In economic terms it is very costly for a
private single party to find such set of facts without priviledged a
priori information, while impartial investigators will find that
relations match together at a minimum cost, that is, with few or no
leads giving unlinked or unexplainable facts.

This setup is particularly interesting:
______m2____v
|
X-WC _m1_\ PT
^
|_____m2____|

X is just any person speaking through walkie talkie carrier,
delivering message 1. This is perceived by the psychic telepath,
coming through the carrier field signal. The reply, message 2, is
meant for the known X, but X is normal, so X only functions as anchor
for the signal. It is the carrier field of WC that will pisck up the
signal and carry it back to PT as the same message 2. Feedback. PT can
**hear** his thoughts coming from WC, who will in fact be confused
with X! X can be left out if WC has also the _concept_ of X, in other
words, the (shared) encoding that identifies X in the thought of PT is
also present in the thought of WC, making the match trigger further
recognition of the encoded message. Note that under a strong carrier
field a psychic, even if not schizo or a telepath can perceive the
signals coming in and out of the intervening parties in the
conversation. X and WC can be found that way, or at least WC being
confused with X. More than one X-WC combinations can be used to hide
or confuse or cover a particular X-WC pair. It is also relevant that
some X may be totally _UNAWARE_ of these signals, but because of the
nearby carrier field X can appear as if X is the _SOURCE_ of a signal,
a totally illusionary signal! Famous but not telepathic or
schizophrenic people may have such a wake of signals, only perceivable
by psychics or when under the carrier fields of others.

It is to be noted that a normal brain has to be conceived as an
insulated electrical device, carrier fields being powerful enough to
cross the insulation barrier, schizo-phrenia and telepathy having the
meaning of this insulation being broken in specific areas. Then it is
important to note that the processing of encodings means in computing
terms to execute some processing module in its own **machine
language**. The language processing area produces language from the
received and internally channeled encoding, and this signal will be
carried out of the insulation by the carrier field. Verbal processing
does take the form of recognizable sound waves because of the one to
one mapping between mechanical sound and electric signals produced by
the eadrum. Little point in re encoding within the language areas to
hide the signal, a recognized signal will be turned and recognized as
sound. Carrier fields then act in the same way as loudspeakers, except
the medium being a magnetic field instead of some gas. It would be a
matter of research to find out whether these magnetic fields are so
strong and of such form that actual air molecules can be moved them,
in which cases talking heads would be more than an oxymoron, some
carrier fields would truly produce an umbrella of voices.

Is dreaming the neutral word? I dreamt of a shotgun to the chest and
three bullets to the head and then other three bullets to the head,
maybe five. And three heart attacks, all in a single night. Which
makes me think of voices lost.

If some people did buy the name confusion, some identifiers will be
totally misleading. I cant understand how come the FBI is not paying
attention to these grand larceny, racketeering case, THREE YEARS after
it was reported.

Looks like I am STILL struggling against the influence of the son of
ex president Fox. It is the influence of the wedge, as I tried to show
from the very beginning. It was important, it cant be that such
enormous power be given to the relative of an ex politician, no matter
how high, much less when so many people were at steak, _much less_
when you didnt even know that person existed. ALL THESE WRITINGS OUT
OF PLACE were meant PRECISELY to stand against such manipulated
oppositions.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore