🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2565

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2565
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:37
71 lines
6365 bytes
In the GEVH(J) the game consists in not arriving to a judge... the
game is similar to that of crossing the river, cannibals and
misionaries cannot cross together, eventually all G and H turned into
E, leaving V alone if H doesnt play well. Some level of role sharing
is part of the game. V s goal is then to distinguish E from G with the
help of H. E have to keep H at bay and turned V into E. A (J) is
always implied but never consulted! Incredible that these people would
call themselves judges... Several ways to implement this game can be
considered, taht is, several rules. Note that specifying this game
this way made me think of

Cabbage patch dolls... should be understandable now, a woman
artifically turned fat through bioterrorism, her crpse hidden under a
cabagge patch... the case was know, even the murderer and names, but
the the hidden channel turned it into a doll product... great idea.
Doll means a woman brutalized woman. It is again the expression of men
fighting their mother, a Freudian conflict,

Lets define a (concurrent) algebra G over all chains of words G:(W,H +
| _ =)

where W, H are chains of words w1w2w3... h1h2h3... there is a number n
of chains occurring simultaneously. For two simulatneous chains
w1w2w3... + h1h2h3...  we can define operators in general as:

+: w1h2w3...
| : w1w2h2w3...
_: h1h2h3...
=: (w1h1)(w2h2)(w3h3)...

This algebra expresses telepathic and freudian slips. Operation + is
the typical freudian slip, where a word is misspelled giving a new
meaning to the whole phrase, that is, some intended word by the
speaker is substituted by a word heard consciously or unconsciously in
the hidden channel; this is the typical slip characterized by freud as
giving some unconscious message; note that some freudian slips swap
words. Operation | intercalates words from the hidden channel in the
speech of the speaker, the speaker unaware of it; in this case the
original speech is meaningful, that is, w1w2 w3.... recover the
original word stream so this operation has a partial inverse operator;
the hidden channel content is expressed by the intercalated words,
which can be distinguished as they themselves form a separate message.
Operation _ would be total substitution of the speaker s speech; the
original stream is lost and the hearer can only hear the hidden
channel, which is true of mediums and trance like states of mind (this
operation can also model the case were there is no underlying speech
stream but the hidden channel is heard nonetheless as coming from the
hypothetical speaker). Operation = intends to purpport that both
channels are heard at the same time by the hearer. Both streams occur,
a schizo hearer would hear both or only the hiddne channel, a normal
hearer would only perceive once stream. Note that for two streams
occurring concurrently, some operations may be confused depending on
the hearer s abilities, so _ and = may be interchangeable, in which
case they can be used to model threshold conditions. | is informative,
+ is misleading to the hearer. In  general there wouldnt be a one to
one correspondence between two the two streams, so some stocasticity
(indetermination) has to be assumed for big numbers of operation
samplings. + may be under control by strong telepaths, strongness
depending on the relation between the telepath and target, while |
would be totally indetermined and may or may not be noticed by the
hearer, though for non schizos would be most informative; some
unconscious selection by the speaker would take place in selecting
what words are included in the resulting stream. The last two
operations would be to blame in coflicts between a target speaker and
an schizo(phrenic) or normal hearer, as the hearer would get a message
very different from that intended by the speaker, though this effect
may or may not be in control of the telepath. (this is what I was
supposed to write yesterday... the other ideas I reserve for later).


Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1171474623.879823.237060@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1170129437.861998.314330@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1170393853.241626.107320@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1170395820.121382.294840@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1170422524.941696.197110@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1170470941.267458.191270@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1170476802.700706.267370@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1170519312.088281.232470@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <1170568418.114591.45940@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <2007020407115150073-x@xx> <1170606937.523574.106800@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1170824360.225741.115470@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1170882179.351318.158880@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1171077898.083507.245480@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1171112779.665943.268790@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1171206705.443658.214370@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,960e2363eb34eac9
X-Google-Thread: 101049,960e2363eb34eac9
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Fabrizio J Bonsignore" <djbonsignore@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
Date: 14 Feb 2007 09:37:03 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <1171474623.879823.237060@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1170129437.861998.314330@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <1170393853.241626.107320@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <1170395820.121382.294840@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
   <1170422524.941696.197110@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1170470941.267458.191270@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1170476802.700706.267370@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1170519312.088281.232470@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
   <1170568418.114591.45940@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
   <2007020407115150073-x@xx>
   <1170606937.523574.106800@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1170824360.225741.115470@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
   <1170882179.351318.158880@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1171077898.083507.245480@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <1171112779.665943.268790@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <1171206705.443658.214370@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 17.255.240.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1171474640 23640 127.0.0.1 (14 Feb 2007 17:37:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:37:20 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1171206705.443658.214370@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=17.255.240.2;
   posting-account=n9LfjQ0AAADUAsm85Yd27wTgCz9kLl7T