Article View: sci.econ
Article #2568Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
From: cbruce
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:03
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:03
164 lines
11955 bytes
11955 bytes
On 26 Jan, 05:29, "Fabrizio J Bonsignore" <djbonsign...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 24, 5:59 am, "FabrizioJBonsignore" <djbonsign...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Do you understand that belief in the ADTERLIFE comes because a brain > > > can survive a dead body long enough to emit some voices, maybe even > > > without noting it is already dead? The brain can survive a dead body > > > ENOUGH to use telepathy!!! They dont understand that a frightened brain > > > in a dead body will edperiment a rush of adrenaline making it use > > > telepathy to access other people. Some beliefs can be understood now. > > > Big pain would turn the speech, if at all, blurry, blurrying the signal > > > to the point that a apeson dying in pain, torture, would be UNABLE to > > > use telapthy to report his death. Dying CONVINCED of afterlife and in a > > > state of peacefulness would be able to emit a coherent enough message > > > to be heard, the famous light, which of course would be charged of the > > > belief, able to convince other people, schizos. A chain is thus formed > > > of belief in the afterlife, when in fact it is just a signal > > > transmitted beacuse of a SURVIVAL mechanism: that of alarm, the > > > adrenaline alarm system acting to deliver a message when the body > > > itself feels its death, a fact taht is RATIONAL, mindful, not > > > biological in the sense that a body can recognize something else that > > > damage expressed as pain. Of course, the better this abilities are > > > essayed in life (Bardo Todol preparation, meditation, > > also Tibetan reincarnation of the Dalai Lama; the dying Dalai Lama > magnetizes a baby or a boy s brain, even for months, an event sensitive > lamas would be able to track down to the baby; what exactly is > communicated and can be transmitted is a matter for research, though > most likely it is deep memories the only content that would survive > brain growth and learning, while self, consciousness, cognitive > abilities and other mind potencies being dynamic would be determined by > hardwiring and environment, in other words, unless the transmitting > mind can make a one to one copy of dynamic neural patterns, which > implies direct access to its own contents, the baby would be an > independent being, though language abilities may be enhanced and > personality would be colored by projected memories [experiences, > feelings] > > > > ), the better the > > > telepathic message would be delivered. Note that according to the > > > formula, some encoding will resonate with another rational target if > > > the target is contained in that particular thought-message. This is > > > relevant as people looking like a murderer, if the act of murder is > > > such that recognition of the danger leaves time to the brain to become > > > ON, WILL get the mesage, including whatever other information it may > > > contain, most likely base sensations, as a sudden murder would devoid > > > the person of coherent thought. Here is yet another telepathic > > > characteristic that makes torture a common act in schizophrenics... > > ...Arachnids in desert a > > [Note that bipolar manic depressive illnesses may be cause by a distant > telepath not strong enough to make its message overcome the threshold > of consiousness. The depressed person would be unable to hear the voice > or voices at the conscious level, only their influence would be felt at > the subconsious level or expressed consciously as sudden black moods > and ideas out of the normal chain of thought. Areas receiving these > messages may be different than those involved in recognition of nearer > messages; again, the complex dynamic of distance, training, awareness, > turning it into a complex casuistic. This, no doubt, explains why people that live in mobile homes, and other structures made mainly of metal, exhibit fewer of these tendencies. Metal is widely known to be an effective emf shield. You may have also stumbled onto the cause of the increased incidence of depression among that segment of the population that inhabits metal structures. It being a well known fact, that that part population has a significantly greater incidence of depression than the population in general. Maybe I should stop wearing my aluminum foil hat when I go outside? This idea of a far distance can > also explain the myth of the **voice of conscience**, usually a child s > voice. In this case elements of the full message get lost by distance, > mainly any tone of voice information, leaving words as the most ordered > and customary element, therefore the strongest, though of course the > person s self hook has to be present too in order to receive the > message. This makes women again more susceptible to telepathic > phenomena, as males thought can be reduced mainly to women, _their_ > contents divided into men and babies, children, when it comes at > thinking of people in a wide sense, essentially dividing contacts in > half, hence susceptibility; libido, desire, directs the target of most > thoughts, most appreciable over huge masses of humanity.] > > Ruins. Considering that recognition of messages depends on recognizing > very small ordered patterns in resonance (native language) with brain > patterns, it is not impossible that the accumulated effect of people s > mind thinking _at_ buildings and monuments leave behind subtly ordered > molecular patterns, a slight variation over normal molecular freedom > but significative enough for sensitive minds to discern them. Hence the > origin of (legends of) ghosts, memory of murders (other explanations > possible), religious phenomena like prayings, memory of places, feeling > of a place being inhabited, etc. Some ruins would vecome ruins under > the necessit yof schizos of stop hearing the voices of other ages, > other peoples. This would be the more true in hot zones, where > alternating warmth and cold under the combined effect of people s > thought, would be enough to establish this subtle orderings. Of course, > religious monuments and ruins, being the object of praying and the > target for the presence of many people would become more **magnetized** > than seldom noticed places. They would seem to be **alive**, or to > share in the religious message. (It would be interesting to ask if this > was one of the reasons why the Buddhas in Afghanistan were destroyed). Good thing they blasted 'em with artillary, from a distance. If they'da got too close, they might'a changed their minds. > The material of monuments would be important, ceramics, metals and > other impurities helping to this effect, though it has to be taken into > account that the **form**, content of directed thoughts would also make > sensitive people fall into the ilusion (or delusion) that it is the > monument that emits the voice, when actually it is the same brain that > picks up the message and it is interpreted, correctly, as containing or > being transmitted from, that building, or for that matter object. Here > we have also the origin of psychic recognition of objects, of > sensitivity to the posession and to the ability to obtain psychic > impressions from an object. Again emotion in the form of fear would > charge these objects and places with very strongly ordered resonant > patters at the molecular level. Destruction of buildings would be the > obvious, not technical solution if they become the preferred target for > a group of people to deliver their messages (or prayings). An > alternative more technological solution would be that of using a foam > to cover the target... Foam would only be effective against sonic radiation. Better to use some kind of metal. Preferrably aluminum... like my hat. > Places where spiders abound or are very noticeable can establish a > strong subconscious association to women in local populations, that can > be measured in an increased level of violence against women. What > matters is that these and other associations, repeated throughout a > whole human population, can produce such strong, base, underlying > signals that some individuals can become truly magnetized by the, lets > call it, emotion, that they express it in the form of real violence. > Being exposed to spiders as a day to day fact can be translated into > violence against women at the level of psychosis! I'm think'n bug spray ought'ta work pretty good. One step beyond > phobia to spiders, though it may be necessary to introduce an internal > clasp to sustain those violent feelings. Some of these clasps, internal > like beliefs or external like mores, may be developed historically as > culture, giving as a result endemic levels of violence. Arachnids do > seem to be have this effect more than other forms of threat, including > that of human populations. [An econometrical study distinguishing > between deserts, jungles and other ecosystems correlated to violence > against women would give a good population level proof] I dunno, you may have sunk yourself now. Women seem to be a popular target of violence in some parts of the Middle East from what I read. > I am still writing this here because I am still in the same > circumstance, so I insist that the theft of what I was an object is > enough to put me under pressure and danger, myself and other people I > still dont have contact with. I still dont understand how come I am not > getting an adequate RESPONSE to my issues. Yeah, that's a mystery. > Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1171523038.976662.196960@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1166506138.000162.156860@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> <1166744699.886452.55840@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1166869530.341437.298290@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <1166926408.562521.61970@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167581591.105048.292540@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1167955282.572714.227440@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1169245727.780677.252280@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169305908.349059.241030@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1169354198.494380.106620@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169408531.683884.93020@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> <1169527385.188573.47070@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1169607028.711448.306460@d71g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169636355.355035.81600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,960e2363eb34eac9 X-Google-Thread: 101049,960e2363eb34eac9 X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "cbruce" <carlbruce@inbox.com> Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields Date: 14 Feb 2007 23:03:59 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 166 Message-ID: <1171523038.976662.196960@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1166506138.000162.156860@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> <1166744699.886452.55840@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1166869530.341437.298290@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <1166926408.562521.61970@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167581591.105048.292540@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1167955282.572714.227440@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1169245727.780677.252280@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169305908.349059.241030@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1169354198.494380.106620@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169408531.683884.93020@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> <1169527385.188573.47070@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1169607028.711448.306460@d71g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169636355.355035.81600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.209.4.89 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1171523051 9174 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2007 07:04:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.209.4.89; posting-account=0y_KiA0AAABk0yLT2_mLWbFblD6iJM5e