Article View: sci.econ
Article #2591Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:57
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:57
74 lines
6865 bytes
6865 bytes
Quote See how this stick I am beating on you head hurts so much
because you dont want to let ME PROTECT YOU? End of quote
So it is a solution to a problem but to make the solution worthwhile
the problem has to be exacerbated, then the solution can be shown as
being good once they apply it to stop the problem they exarcebated!
Weeping statues are easy to explain. It is the ergonomy of the human
eye that will make accumulated dampness coalesce into drops that will
slide down the face over the cheeks. The coupula like form of the eye
guarantees it, even in statues. ampness and water dont accumulate in
the eye, no danger of becoming blind for that reason, though the
sunken form of the human eye must have more to do with growth of the
frontal lobes than with the danger of being blind by accumulation of
liquids. Very likely the dripping of artificial tears in statues may
be an effect of subtle sculpting, some statues having the excat form
that optimizes the forming of artificial tears.
Note the following setup:
____no____\ S
T ___mnop____\ ST
The complex message mnop is heard vy ST. ST has also the ability to
transmit thought. What S gets is no, ST can supress ay complex message
and transmit only the memory of that part of the message he prefers.
He would be a switcher, a selector, the communication between T and S
being distorted because of the presence of ST. ST is the wedge. It
will matter the strength of ST signals as compared to T and S. If it
is strong, there will be no direct communication between T and S but
through ST. T would have to have bigger potency than ST to reach S.
This establishes an ordering, ST > T > S will make (T, ST, S) the
order of communications, whereas T > ST > S would turn into (T, S),
(T, ST) the set of communications, where the second communication can
be obviated. Thene ther is an interested of either turning ST
stronger, which may not be possible at all, OR turning T weaker, which
is the reason of bioterrorisms and other cultural pseudosolutions to
telepathy. In this setup ST can gain power over both T and S by not
communicating them or communicating only selected portions of any
message. IN the above diagram, the complex message mnop ends up being
no to S. Taken literally a positive message becomes total negation.
This idea is important the moment linguistic evolution is considered.
Note that the reductinon crom mnop down to no does not necessarily
have a bad intention, but may have much more to do with attention, the
prefix being lost while attention realizes there is a message (no
headers in natural languages, which would be an important addition to
children s language in fully telepathic societies if they are ever
realized), and the suffix lost as the mind of ST realizes the from
whom and to whom may that message be directed. Some of this processing
may be done in parallel, the final transmission to S being a side
effect of thinking in the to whom it was meant once an intial
recognition or hypothesizing of who is T is finished. A more complete
diagram then would be: ...
The same way acupuncture can change the softwiring of the brain to
affect telepathy and schizophrenia by numbing or exciting nerve
processing, then conditioning that stimulus, torture can have exactly
the same effect, only applied in a barbaric way! So the secrets of
torturers would lie in precisely how to cause these effects. Empiric
knowledge, subject to error. Remember that torture and inflicting pain
can cause a brain to turn on or fall into schizophrenia out of fear,
but then also can be used to turn it off. Most likely what happens is
that the experience of torture leaves in the brain permanent scars,
numb areas, inhibited, that in processing terms would give a zero (may
be a permanent one as representation too, at least while that
particular set of neurons is still alive). So a permanent, cronic pain
may be considered a cure by torturers, as attention would be directed
to that pain on a periodic base. Other formulas must be in the hands
of torturing sects **selling** this kind of services, either services
considered very valuable for being secret and specialized even if
empiric. As most facts in this field, it is empirism what rules, it s
solutions not taking into account the development of new technology,
thus leading to costly social effects.
Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1170129437.861998.314330@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1167581591.105048.292540@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1167955282.572714.227440@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1169245727.780677.252280@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169305908.349059.241030@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1169354198.494380.106620@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169408531.683884.93020@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> <1169527385.188573.47070@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1169607028.711448.306460@d71g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169636355.355035.81600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169864467.277267.183180@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <1169965230.439595.108600@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1170037824.466331.289900@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1170078383.744508.7080@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,960e2363eb34eac9 X-Google-Thread: 101049,960e2363eb34eac9 X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Fabrizio J Bonsignore" <djbonsignore@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields Date: 29 Jan 2007 19:57:17 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 75 Message-ID: <1170129437.861998.314330@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> References: <1167581591.105048.292540@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1167955282.572714.227440@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1169245727.780677.252280@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169305908.349059.241030@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1169354198.494380.106620@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169408531.683884.93020@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> <1169527385.188573.47070@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1169607028.711448.306460@d71g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169636355.355035.81600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169864467.277267.183180@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <1169965230.439595.108600@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1170037824.466331.289900@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1170078383.744508.7080@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.196.0.50 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1170129445 20130 127.0.0.1 (30 Jan 2007 03:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:57:25 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1170078383.744508.7080@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.196.0.50; posting-account=n9LfjQ0AAADUAsm85Yd27wTgCz9kLl7T