Article View: sci.econ
Article #2609Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
From: Fabrizio J Bonsignore
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:29
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:29
129 lines
10656 bytes
10656 bytes
On Jan 24, 5:59 am, "FabrizioJBonsignore" <djbonsign...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Do you understand that belief in the ADTERLIFE comes because a brain > > can survive a dead body long enough to emit some voices, maybe even > > without noting it is already dead? The brain can survive a dead body > > ENOUGH to use telepathy!!! They dont understand that a frightened brain > > in a dead body will edperiment a rush of adrenaline making it use > > telepathy to access other people. Some beliefs can be understood now. > > Big pain would turn the speech, if at all, blurry, blurrying the signal > > to the point that a apeson dying in pain, torture, would be UNABLE to > > use telapthy to report his death. Dying CONVINCED of afterlife and in a > > state of peacefulness would be able to emit a coherent enough message > > to be heard, the famous light, which of course would be charged of the > > belief, able to convince other people, schizos. A chain is thus formed > > of belief in the afterlife, when in fact it is just a signal > > transmitted beacuse of a SURVIVAL mechanism: that of alarm, the > > adrenaline alarm system acting to deliver a message when the body > > itself feels its death, a fact taht is RATIONAL, mindful, not > > biological in the sense that a body can recognize something else that > > damage expressed as pain. Of course, the better this abilities are > > essayed in life (Bardo Todol preparation, meditation, also Tibetan reincarnation of the Dalai Lama; the dying Dalai Lama magnetizes a baby or a boy s brain, even for months, an event sensitive lamas would be able to track down to the baby; what exactly is communicated and can be transmitted is a matter for research, though most likely it is deep memories the only content that would survive brain growth and learning, while self, consciousness, cognitive abilities and other mind potencies being dynamic would be determined by hardwiring and environment, in other words, unless the transmitting mind can make a one to one copy of dynamic neural patterns, which implies direct access to its own contents, the baby would be an independent being, though language abilities may be enhanced and personality would be colored by projected memories [experiences, feelings] > > ), the better the > > telepathic message would be delivered. Note that according to the > > formula, some encoding will resonate with another rational target if > > the target is contained in that particular thought-message. This is > > relevant as people looking like a murderer, if the act of murder is > > such that recognition of the danger leaves time to the brain to become > > ON, WILL get the mesage, including whatever other information it may > > contain, most likely base sensations, as a sudden murder would devoid > > the person of coherent thought. Here is yet another telepathic > > characteristic that makes torture a common act in schizophrenics... ...Arachnids in desert a [Note that bipolar manic depressive illnesses may be cause by a distant telepath not strong enough to make its message overcome the threshold of consiousness. The depressed person would be unable to hear the voice or voices at the conscious level, only their influence would be felt at the subconsious level or expressed consciously as sudden black moods and ideas out of the normal chain of thought. Areas receiving these messages may be different than those involved in recognition of nearer messages; again, the complex dynamic of distance, training, awareness, turning it into a complex casuistic. This idea of a far distance can also explain the myth of the **voice of conscience**, usually a child s voice. In this case elements of the full message get lost by distance, mainly any tone of voice information, leaving words as the most ordered and customary element, therefore the strongest, though of course the person s self hook has to be present too in order to receive the message. This makes women again more susceptible to telepathic phenomena, as males thought can be reduced mainly to women, _their_ contents divided into men and babies, children, when it comes at thinking of people in a wide sense, essentially dividing contacts in half, hence susceptibility; libido, desire, directs the target of most thoughts, most appreciable over huge masses of humanity.] Ruins. Considering that recognition of messages depends on recognizing very small ordered patterns in resonance (native language) with brain patterns, it is not impossible that the accumulated effect of people s mind thinking _at_ buildings and monuments leave behind subtly ordered molecular patterns, a slight variation over normal molecular freedom but significative enough for sensitive minds to discern them. Hence the origin of (legends of) ghosts, memory of murders (other explanations possible), religious phenomena like prayings, memory of places, feeling of a place being inhabited, etc. Some ruins would vecome ruins under the necessit yof schizos of stop hearing the voices of other ages, other peoples. This would be the more true in hot zones, where alternating warmth and cold under the combined effect of people s thought, would be enough to establish this subtle orderings. Of course, religious monuments and ruins, being the object of praying and the target for the presence of many people would become more **magnetized** than seldom noticed places. They would seem to be **alive**, or to share in the religious message. (It would be interesting to ask if this was one of the reasons why the Buddhas in Afghanistan were destroyed). The material of monuments would be important, ceramics, metals and other impurities helping to this effect, though it has to be taken into account that the **form**, content of directed thoughts would also make sensitive people fall into the ilusion (or delusion) that it is the monument that emits the voice, when actually it is the same brain that picks up the message and it is interpreted, correctly, as containing or being transmitted from, that building, or for that matter object. Here we have also the origin of psychic recognition of objects, of sensitivity to the posession and to the ability to obtain psychic impressions from an object. Again emotion in the form of fear would charge these objects and places with very strongly ordered resonant patters at the molecular level. Destruction of buildings would be the obvious, not technical solution if they become the preferred target for a group of people to deliver their messages (or prayings). An alternative more technological solution would be that of using a foam to cover the target... Places where spiders abound or are very noticeable can establish a strong subconscious association to women in local populations, that can be measured in an increased level of violence against women. What matters is that these and other associations, repeated throughout a whole human population, can produce such strong, base, underlying signals that some individuals can become truly magnetized by the, lets call it, emotion, that they express it in the form of real violence. Being exposed to spiders as a day to day fact can be translated into violence against women at the level of psychosis! One step beyond phobia to spiders, though it may be necessary to introduce an internal clasp to sustain those violent feelings. Some of these clasps, internal like beliefs or external like mores, may be developed historically as culture, giving as a result endemic levels of violence. Arachnids do seem to be have this effect more than other forms of threat, including that of human populations. [An econometrical study distinguishing between deserts, jungles and other ecosystems correlated to violence against women would give a good population level proof] I am still writing this here because I am still in the same circumstance, so I insist that the theft of what I was an object is enough to put me under pressure and danger, myself and other people I still dont have contact with. I still dont understand how come I am not getting an adequate RESPONSE to my issues. Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1166490756.925976.230140@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1166504486.568917.147040@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1166506138.000162.156860@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> <1166744699.886452.55840@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1166869530.341437.298290@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <1166926408.562521.61970@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167581591.105048.292540@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1167955282.572714.227440@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1169245727.780677.252280@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169305908.349059.241030@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1169354198.494380.106620@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169408531.683884.93020@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> <1169527385.188573.47070@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1169607028.711448.306460@d71g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169636355.355035.81600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,960e2363eb34eac9 X-Google-Thread: 101049,960e2363eb34eac9 X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Fabrizio J Bonsignore" <djbonsignore@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields Date: 26 Jan 2007 05:29:18 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 130 Message-ID: <1169818158.504492.317880@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1166490756.925976.230140@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1166504486.568917.147040@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1166506138.000162.156860@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> <1166744699.886452.55840@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1166869530.341437.298290@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <1166926408.562521.61970@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1167581591.105048.292540@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1167955282.572714.227440@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <1169245727.780677.252280@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169305908.349059.241030@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1169354198.494380.106620@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169408531.683884.93020@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> <1169527385.188573.47070@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1169607028.711448.306460@d71g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1169636355.355035.81600@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.196.0.50 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1169818171 31647 127.0.0.1 (26 Jan 2007 13:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:29:31 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1169709522.093551.202690@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.196.0.50; posting-account=n9LfjQ0AAADUAsm85Yd27wTgCz9kLl7T