🚀 go-pugleaf

Fabrizio J Bonsignore wrote:
> This diagram can be further extended this way, to advance an idea in
> another thread:
>
>
> .............................................<---policies, police,
> politcs---->
> .......................................................o
> |___________________________|----------------------| = National economy
> |_Invisible hand markets________| market failures|
>
Note the o space is multidimensional and contains several elements or
dimensions. The easiest way to describe it is by thinking of the data /
algorythm distinction in systems. It is roughly the equivalence
time-space in programming, so we can take advantage of the tradeoff
between both. IOW, people belong to the National Economy set (the
straight line), while the rules of the system are the definition of the
o set. Note also that in poiltical terms as depicted moving the knob to
the right we have more laissez fare, more right-ist  economics, while
moving it to the left has more left-ish economics. In this motivating
metaphor, the market failure term is just a generic for what I think as
non legal, mafia style economic behaviours. (I tink of that set as
determined extensively and not intensivly, as it expresses different
structures of human behaviour, modulated by the o set, different from
the invisible hand market interactions that express some very well
defined behaviour or mechanisms). Note also that the f-set can not only
find an optimum, but *also* we can postulate some f-set such that one
side or both sides go null, WHILE at the sme time the ;ength of the
economy line grows or diminishes accordingly...

>
> So the o is like a knob. It is policies, police, politics, government,
> law, what marks the change or proportion of both structures. On one
> side (left) we would have democracy and laissez fairez, on the other
> full dictatorship, of course, with all the nunaces as modifiers to be
> later explained.
>
> Note that markets as such can be seen as a structure to **handle** n
> possible goods, but in any given economy (as per the modern world),
> there are n-f goods that are traded in markets: f are the forbidden
> goods. So as a parameter of the **knob** we include this f set, as a
> determinant of market failures brought about by the introduction of
> forbidden goods, outstanding people as a good, but also secondary
> **people** markets as organ _donations_ or corpse produce...
>
> (And so it seems that their trick is to get rid of many people and then
> create a new, artificial life for _somebody_  to please their goals,
> independently of what was and is. They have my hard drives, I still
> deman Justice).
>
> Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore

Fabrizio J BOnsignore now Danilo J BOnsignore