🚀 go-pugleaf

"Fabrizio J Bonsignore" <fbonsignore@beethoven.com> wrote in message
news:1112683963.973688.135280@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> [From the last comments it may be advanced the hypothesis that if the
> propensity ot work (laziness) is a cultural variable determining the
> supply of labor over the sum of individuals, then all societies, for
> homogeneous cultural values, experiment *approximately* the same level
> of welfare. That is, differences in product are actually discounted by
> propensity to work (cultural sloth) and are the same, the same way that
> we discount variables to amke them real. Product is the same for
> homogeneous cultures in terms of real sloth.]
>
> Fabrizio J Bonsignore, now Danilo J Bonsignore

What absolute nonsense!

You may well be discussing morals and/or religious beliefs, but you are
not discussing economics.  What a person or a society might do with
their free time (their freedom) is not a morality.  Whether they lie in the
sun and look at the women go by or spend the time education
themselves and creating things of value to the society is not at issue
except for the fact that their PRODUCTIVE efforts in NEW things
will increase the freedom of others both now and in the future.  Throwing
fundamentalism and magical crapola at it is counterproductive to
the actual science of economics.