🚀 go-pugleaf

As a counterexample to the Mexican notion of crimes against health as
an incriminatin tool, and to make obvious the ideological content of
it, I want to mention that, as a problem of public health in Mexico,
cavities has the magitude of an epidemic, an endemic epidemic. One of
the reasons behind it is the lack of fluoride in water. Until a fw
years ago, Mexico`s water was not sanitized with fluoride. This had
the effect of making wole generatios grow up without that protection
against cavities. Though this problem has apparenty been solved, the
soluti came before the concept of `crimes against health` was used as
a police tool. The fact that it is an inrimination tool comes from its
nature as a non prescribable crime. So it is just needed some
testimonies (conspiracy) to *prove* that any citizen is guilty f
crimes againstealth. And the longer it takes to make the accusatios,
the longer time to fabricate proof, as is used in the Mexican police
(read La Bola, a novel). Crimes realted to rugs need be judged at te
moment, in frganti, otherwise there is a reasonable doubt abt the gult
of any accused citizen by this crime concept. It must be noted that,
the moment Mexico wants to bring back a citizen (or somebody
considered as a citizen, since their constitution recognizes an
unlimited citizenshibased on race, which effectively needs only prove
that some far way relative in direct descent was Mexican to prove that
the individual is also Mexican), it just needs to file for `crimes
against health`. It is easy to prove after applying the concept of
side effects to unsuspecting victims. Ina judicial system based on
jurisprudence, this effectively forces judges to extradite people, as
any judgement against can be seen as support for the legalization of
drugs. The different prescription times makes it an unbeatable tool
for the Mexican government`s political needs, unless the fact is
recognized that it actually leaves no option to judges of another
country, so it is a veiled pressure tool against the sovereignty of
the extraditing country, beyond the extradition country`s (secret)
policy with respect to side effects (unnecessary effects brought about
by prejudices about the effects of drug consumption). As a legalcont
that has automatic effects oer the law of other coies, actually
bypassing them if they are based on jurisprudence, it acnnot be
accepted, beside the fact that it leads to the sanction and even to
the need of side effects, in this case applied by the police corps in
charge of these crimes, namely, the federal police.