Thread View: sci.econ
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Fabrizio J. Bonsignore
Sat, 06 Nov 2004 19:08
A proposal for limited jurisprudence
Author: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 19:08
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 19:08
13 lines
1920 bytes
1920 bytes
As a simple way to avoid the foreign pressure (taking advantage of) a jurisprudence based law system, a principle of limited jurisprudence can be applied in such way that cases involving foreign governments CANNOT be used as antecedents to new decisions. It forces judges to make decisions according to each case, knowing that their decision will not affect the _whole_ law system, but will be relevant only for djb the current case. This can take into account particular circumstances due to political and diplomatic interests on the base of a foreign policy principle clearly stated. This proposal effectively insulates a jurisprudence system from external law systems. Without it, law systems tend to synchronize and adopt the more general approach in the case of case by case systems or different crime definitions or to equiparate in the case of jurisprudence systems.
Re: A proposal for limited jurisprudence
Author: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:11
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:11
29 lines
2773 bytes
2773 bytes
fbonsignore@beethoven.com (Fabrizio J. Bonsignore) wrote in message news:<768f7623.0411071400.746aca2@posting.google.com>... > As a simple way to avoid the foreign pressure (taking advantage of) a > jurisprudence based law system, a principle of limited jurisprudence > can be applied in such way that cases involving foreign governments > CANNOT be used as antecedents to new decisions. It forces judges to > make decisions according to each case, knowing that their decision > will not affect the _whole_ law system, but will be relevant only for > djb the current case. This can take into account particular > circumstances due to political and diplomatic interests on the base of > a foreign policy principle clearly stated. This proposal effectively > insulates a jurisprudence system from external law systems. Without > it, law systems tend to synchronize and adopt the more general > approach in the case of case by case systems or different crime > definitions or to equiparate in the case of jurisprudence systems. Two jurisprudence systems require a negotiation and will eventually ed up recognizing same crimes and definitions, provided all crimes are exemplified by fleeing criminals through the borders. But in the case of a non jurisprudence system, it will assume a hierarchical relationship, where non-jurisprudence > jurisprudence for less restricted definitions of crime non-jurisprudence < non-jurisprudence for more restricted definitions of crime (not clear enough, but I am freezing in a metal keyboard outside NY). Limited jurisprudence in foreign cases effectively decouples both systems. Crime definition negotitation is case by case always.
Re: A proposal for limited jurisprudence
Author: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:11
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:11
7 lines
1512 bytes
1512 bytes
Limiting the application of jurisprudence in this manner makes the law system independent from other law systems without losing the advantages of jurisprudence of accumulating a decision base from which to infer judgements (thus reducing arbitrariness at the cost of crystalizing a particular judging culture) while strengthening the sovereignty of the country which applies it. This is a rephrasement of previous the initial post.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads