🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1688E9798.JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com>, JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com writes:
> In article <92299.013439U56503@uicvm.uic.edu>
> U56503@uicvm.uic.edu writes:
> 
> *** much political propaganda deleted ***
> 
> Others may have differing opinions.  But I feel this is a forum for
> SCIENCE about EDUCATION (hence the name sci.edu).  Political

The original poster provided very interesting information on EDUCATION.

That poster made me think about the EDUCATIONAL approaches that Bill Clinton 
applied in Arkansas, and about how those approaches could be extrapolated
for the entire nation.

It is up to the reader to agree or disagree with those comments.  If we
care about education, then we might be interested in knowing the educational
approaches of the presidential candidates.  This forum is appropriate for 
those comments.

> statements about what one candidate would do or what the other
> candidate supposedly has or has not done, especially when posed with
> a "vote for me" bias, seems unworthy of a science forum.
> If the original poster would care to fashion these political promises
> into something scientific, then I might change my mind.
> Otherwise, please post to alt.politics.clinton.

If you think any of the original statements were bias or even false, then
please identify such statements and post them in this forum.

Oscar Trevizo
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are just my personal comments.