Re: Sartre's 3 laws ( was Re: 2nd law not taught etc)

Article View: sci.edu

Article #56

#56

From: Geoff Mccaughan
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 10:29

13 lines
930 bytes

J. Lani Herrmann (lanih@herald.Berkeley.EDU) wrote:

>This was from the same person who described the workings of an internal 
>combustion engine as
> Suck, squeeze, bang, ptooie!

Hmmm, I heard it as Suck, squeeze, bang! blow, or in the case of a
two-stroke, it's sucksqueeze bangblow !

--
Geoff, Sysop Equinox (equinox.gen.nz) +64 (3) 3854406 [4 Lines]
                               Voice: +64 (3) 3852101
        "Hi. You have just entered the fourth dimension. Small isn't it?"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Geoff.2onr@equinox.gen.nz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!newshost.wcc.govt.nz!fmcg!equinox!Geoff

References: <18ok7uINNljc@agate.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!newshost.wcc.govt.nz!fmcg!equinox!Geoff
From: Geoff@equinox.gen.nz (Geoff Mccaughan)
Newsgroups: sci.edu,alt.folklore.science
Subject: Re: Sartre's 3 laws ( was Re: 2nd law not taught etc)
Message-ID: <Geoff.2onr@equinox.gen.nz>
Date: 13 Sep 92 22:29:10 +1200
References: <18ok7uINNljc@agate.berkeley.edu>
Organization: Equinox Networks
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message