Re: Sartre's 3 laws ( was Re: 2nd law not taught etc)

Article View: sci.edu

Article #76

#76

From: baylor
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 15:55

19 lines
1410 bytes

In article <1992Sep2.022653.28657@u.washington.edu>, 
grimjack@milton.u.washington.edu (Leslie Basel) writes:
>
>I am not really sure who it was who came up with this redefinition of
>the 3 laws but I like 'em anyhow:
>  1) You can't win,
>
>  2) You can't break even,
>
>  3) You can't get out of the game.
>
>Rodger Coghlan
>
I rather liked an addendum I heard:
    Every major philosphy designed to make sense of of life relies on 
    denying one of these rules.
	1) Capitalism denies you can't win.
	2) Communism denies you can't break even.
	3) Mysticism denies you can't get out of the game.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep2.155533.18092@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!taligent!apple!netcomsv!iscnvx!enterprise!news

References:

<1992Aug26.161418.27451@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com> <pete.036g@bignode.equinox.gen.nz> <1992Aug28.214139.451@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>,<1992Sep2.022653.28657@u.washington.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!taligent!apple!netcomsv!iscnvx!enterprise!news
From: baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: sci.edu,alt.folklore.science
Subject: Re: Sartre's 3 laws ( was Re: 2nd law not taught etc)
Message-ID: <1992Sep2.155533.18092@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:55:33 GMT
References: <1992Aug26.161418.27451@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com> <pete.036g@bignode.equinox.gen.nz> <1992Aug28.214139.451@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>,<1992Sep2.022653.28657@u.washington.edu>
Sender: news@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Reply-To: baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com

Reply to Parent Message