🚀 go-pugleaf

Lizzie Borden wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:09:01 GMT, Henry Schmidt
> <schmitty@nottelling.nope> wrote:
> 
>> Lionel wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 06:33:04 -0500, John Fields
>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:35:20 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:29:56 -0500, John Fields
>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:40:40 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:01:59 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:33:24 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:26:25 -0500, John Fields 
>>>>>>>>>                    ^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:19:52 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>>>                     ^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:31:13 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>>>                      ^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems like carelessness is your modus vivendi.  Here:
>>>>>>>>>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:nuul0394807o6fkdavpshj779ksntt4kpg@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> Slight modification:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       +---------+
>>>>>>>>>>>       | +-----+ |     +-----+
>>>>>>>>>>>       +-|D   Q|-|-----|S   Q|----[LED>]-+
>>>>>>>>>>> CLK>-----|>   _| |     |    _|           |
>>>>>>>>>>>         |    Q|-+-----|R   Q|----[LED>]-+
>>>>>>>>>>>         +-----+       +-----+           |
>>>>>>>>>>>           U1A           U1B            [R]
>>>>>>>>>>>                                         |
>>>>>>>>>>>                                        GND
>>>>>>>>>> Bad idea for 4000 CMOS running With Vcc high enough to reverse-bias
>>>>>>>>>> the LED in excess of its rating.
>>>>>>>>> What was that you were just saying about carelessness, Johnny?
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> _Not_ having posted the caveat would have been careless.  The single
>>>>>>>> resistor would be fine, (since no more than one LED would be on at a
>>>>>>>> time) and maybe save a few pennies in systems running with 5V Vcc,
>>>>>>>> but since 4K CMOS can be run at up to 18V, at that voltage the
>>>>>>>> resistor would be dropping about 16V, (for an LED Vf of 2V) severely
>>>>>>>> reverse-biasing the OFF LED, fuckhead.
>>>>>>> But it took you a total of three posts (as noted by the '^^^' in the
>>>>>>> quoted text) to get to that point. And yet when I made a similar error
>>>>>>> - which I also corrected - you started screeching & squawking about my
>>>>>>> oh-so terrible mistake. Seems to me that you're being more than a
>>>>>>> little hypocritical, Little Johnny Liar.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> My first post was fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My second post was an improvement over the first with an oversight
>>>>>> which I corrected as soon as I realized it.
>>>>> Because it's a minor 'oversight' & totally un noteworthy when you do
>>>>> it, but total, completely unforgivable incompetence when someone else
>>>>> does it, eh Johnny? Most people would call that hypocrisy, son.
>>>> ---
>>>> Nope, just you, because you're grasping at straws trying to un-spank
>>>> yourself.  It ain't gonna work, jork.  
>>>>
>>>> My tech advice is good. Yours isn't. End of story.
>>> You really are full of shit, Johnny.
>>>
>> Kook. Looney Loonel
> 
> Kindly desist from posting your electronics shit to soc.men.
> It is off topic and against the Charter.
> 
> This is your only warning. Any repeat and you WILL be reported to
> Google Groups.

Shut up b1tch. Now what????