Article View: sci.electronics.basics
Article #7Re: power supply circuit
From: MooseFET
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:48
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:48
41 lines
3420 bytes
3420 bytes
On Jun 10, 4:26 pm, rebel <m...@privacy.net> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:36:46 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensm...@rahul.net> wrote: > >On Jun 9, 6:32 pm, rebel <m...@privacy.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 07:55:58 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensm...@rahul.net> wrote: > >> >On Jun 9, 5:42 am, F Murtz <hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I would like to make an adjustable power supply using a transformer with > >> >> a 24v 5a single wound secondary I would like the voltage to be > >> >> adjustable from lowest to highest possible given transformer I would > >> >> like to have regulated current > > >> >> There is another possibility I also have a larger transformer with two > >> >> 32v 4.7a secondaries If anyone has a schematic for an adjustable power > >> >> supply with adjustable current regulation making the most of the > >> >> transformer specs I would be eternally grateful > > >> >How much current do you want? > > >> >Lets just assume you make DC from the AC and then regulate down. > > >> >Doing a couple of figures for making 4A into lets say zero volts: > > >> >24V * sqrt(2) = 34V > > >> >34V * 4A = 136W > > >> >The the regulator circuit needs to get rid of 136W. > > >> Minor points - the transformer isn't rated to deliver 136W, and that 34V is > >> unloaded peak. > > >When working out the power in the regulator, it is best to assume that > >the peak voltage is what you get. The rated voltage on the > >transformer is for a normal line voltage. In the high line case, you > >can get a little more. > > I appreciate that, but my original comments stand. There is no valid reason to > state "the regulator circuit needs to get rid of 136W" when the transformer is > not rated to deliver that power. You seem to have a poor understand of what the rating of a transformer means.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<baf93258-eb92-4d7e-87e1-8e70eb388a66@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<484d2532@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <d2d40349-8c3d-4b06-8b8d-d033da31a967@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <0cmr44t5ef0vq5sfaqht71t0rml5nhup8t@4ax.com> <bc963189-471a-4b7c-b72d-2fdf8bd8ac54@l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <ga3u445upv4b1k74h3mgl505v7kd98mlgi@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,5993850357c82189 X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,5993850357c82189 X-Google-Thread: 103407,5993850357c82189 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d0a,gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: power supply circuit Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 41 Message-ID: <baf93258-eb92-4d7e-87e1-8e70eb388a66@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <484d2532@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <d2d40349-8c3d-4b06-8b8d-d033da31a967@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <0cmr44t5ef0vq5sfaqht71t0rml5nhup8t@4ax.com> <bc963189-471a-4b7c-b72d-2fdf8bd8ac54@l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <ga3u445upv4b1k74h3mgl505v7kd98mlgi@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.170.248.151 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1213454935 26075 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2008 14:48:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.170.248.151; posting-account=WpWCSgoAAAD-tgsKntNZep9MY4ctsgnu User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070730 SUSE/2.0.0.6-25 Firefox/2.0.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)