Article View: sci.electronics.components
Article #182Re: Best way to power array of LEDs?
From: R. Lewis
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 18:22
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 18:22
56 lines
4340 bytes
4340 bytes
"Sofie" <sofie@olypen.com> wrote in message news:us7t1tk9t9t795@corp.supernews.com... > R. Lewis: > I know I will get shot down here...... but here is a very inexpensive, > SIMPLE and RELIABLE scheme: > Depending on the specifications of the LEDs and how hard you want to drive > them, you can adjust the value of the series dropping resistor. For > example.....In series with each LED, a 680 ohm half watt resistor will limit > the current to each LED to roughly 19 ma.... actually the total current > swing of about 17 ma to 21 ma (a swing of only + or - 10% total) over > the nominal automotive voltage operating range, driving, idling, and the > motor not running. At a total of 36 LEDs, that is a TOTAL current draw of > only 0.75 Amps..... LESS than a side marker or dome lamp..... so WHO CARES > about "wasted power" in the dropping resistors. > So, how complicated is this?....... 36 LEDs and 36 resistors..... not much > to go wrong here. > At that rate, you could hook up 100 LEDs and pull about 2 Amps..... roughly > the same amount as a brake or tail-light...... and the heat and wasted power > from the resistors will still be negligible..... and would not affect your > gas mileage..... or I suppose a single drop of gasoline in several > tank-fulls should take care of the extra power used. > -- > Best Regards, > Daniel Sofie > Electronics Supply & Repair > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > "R. Lewis" <h.lewis@connect-2.co.uk> wrote in message > news:aq0h2t$nv1$1@thorium.cix.co.uk... > > Amid all the jollity has anyone come up with an economical yet reliable > way > > of making a 36 led array with anywhere near a standard (constant) > > specification? > > I now have a side lamp with an MTBF of what? It also has a unit to unit light output of around +100%, -50% from the average at 20 degC and which gets dimmer as it gets hotter and dimmer as it gets older. It does not have a catastrophic failure mode which has an advantage -one led failing does not cause the lamp to cease completely - and a disadvantage in that a user without a light meter cannot tell if n of the leds have failed and the lamp is illegal. I am reasonably sure that a lit incandescent bulb is reasonably close to its specification provided the supply is OK With such a proposed led scheme I may be driving around with an illegal tail lamp without knowing it ---- until some more points appear on the license. I repeat my question
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<aq1548$hm9$1@thorium.cix.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!proxad.net!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!shale.ftech.net!news.ftech.net!peernews.cix.co.uk!news.nextra.co.uk!not-for-mailReferences:
<0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net> <Rsan9.14070$qh1.1622310@news.ca.inter.net> <ank9ep$lumv$1@hades.csu.net> <anku2n$5so$1@news.wave.co.nz> <7tGLdeAS6fn9EwBv@jmwa.demon.co.uk> <apvlvu$n2c$1@reader1.panix.com> <aq0h2t$nv1$1@thorium.cix.co.uk> <us7t1tk9t9t795@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 1131b0,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid1131b0,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: 1118be,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid1118be,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-02 10:22:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!proxad.net!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!shale.ftech.net!news.ftech.net!peernews.cix.co.uk!news.nextra.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "R. Lewis" <h.lewis@connect-2.co.uk> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,alt.engineering.electrical,aus.electronics,sci.electronics.repair Subject: Re: Best way to power array of LEDs? Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:22:31 -0000 Organization: Nextra UK Lines: 59 Message-ID: <aq1548$hm9$1@thorium.cix.co.uk> References: <0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net> <Rsan9.14070$qh1.1622310@news.ca.inter.net> <ank9ep$lumv$1@hades.csu.net> <anku2n$5so$1@news.wave.co.nz> <7tGLdeAS6fn9EwBv@jmwa.demon.co.uk> <apvlvu$n2c$1@reader1.panix.com> <aq0h2t$nv1$1@thorium.cix.co.uk> <us7t1tk9t9t795@corp.supernews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 39.234.35.212.in-addr.arpa.ip-pool.cix.co.uk X-Trace: thorium.cix.co.uk 1036261320 18121 212.35.234.39 (2 Nov 2002 18:22:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@net.nextra.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000