Article View: sci.electronics.components
Article #249Re: Best way to power array of LEDs?
From: Johnny
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:21
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:21
53 lines
3346 bytes
3346 bytes
On Sat, 05 Oct 2002 01:52:45 GMT, john_wr@NOSPAM.hotmail.com (Johnny) wrote: Before someone jumps in here, there's a potential problem with Negative Temperature coefficient of LEDS for Parrallel connection.. I have a feeling that the series resistance of LEDs may be enough so that "Thermal run-away" is not a problem. Others may know better - I never actually tried it. regards, Johnny. >Here's another idea: > >1) Wire LEDS in 9 groups of 4 series connected leds. Then all 9 >groups wil conduct with a total voltage of about 9V, and can be >connected in parrallel. > >2) Use a LM317T voltage regulator as a "Current regulator" This will >limit the current to what ever amount you decide. The current can be >adjusted by changing the resistor value. The circuit looks like this: > >(+12~13.8V)--------[ LM317T ]------- (output pin) > [ ] > > | < 5.6 ohm 1W > | > Resistor > | < > ------------------ (adjust pin) > | > > [ LED] > [ LED] Parrallel > [ LED] x 9 > [ LED] > | >GND---------------------------------------------- > > >So if you use a drive current of 25mA per LED it will be 225mA in >total. Othwerwise you can calculated. The LM317 will dissipate just >over 1W when the input volage is maximum. So it will need a small >heatsink, or if you reduce the current to about 100-150mA you probably >dont need any heatsink, although it will still get quite warm. > >You can calculate the resistor value by: >R = 1.25 / (Current in Amps) > >Hope this helps, > >regards, >Johnny. >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3d9e4bb8.12496215@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net> <3d9e3f18.9263139@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 1131b0,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid1131b0,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-Thread: 1118be,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid1118be,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-04 19:20:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail From: john_wr@NOSPAM.hotmail.com (Johnny) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,alt.engineering.electrical,aus.electronics,sci.electronics.repair Subject: Re: Best way to power array of LEDs? Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:21:09 GMT Reply-To: john_wr@NOSPAM.hotmail.com Message-ID: <3d9e4bb8.12496215@news.optusnet.com.au> References: <0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net> <3d9e3f18.9263139@news.optusnet.com.au> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Lines: 54 NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.28.24.227 X-Trace: 1033784233 18870 211.28.24.227