Article View: sci.electronics.components
Article #281Re: Best way to power array of LEDs?
From: C what I mean
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:53
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:53
62 lines
3775 bytes
3775 bytes
No one asked what kind of LEDs. Some of the Lumileds LEDs draw up to 500ma each! The newer ones can reach 750ma consistently. I doubt anyone would use them in a car brake light.. but they are out there and used a lot...... for other applications of course. "Jerry G." <jerryg50@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Rsan9.14070$qh1.1622310@news.ca.inter.net... > Each LED must have its own series resistor. Most of these LED's work > at about 30 to 40 ma with about 1.6 VDC across them. You should be able > to use a 320 ohm 1/2 watt resistor in series with each LED if these are > in the spec range that I used as an example. > > LED's cannot be wired in parallel to each other being fed from one > resistor. They can not also be wired in series with each other. > > -- > > Greetings, > > Jerry Greenberg GLG Technologies GLG > ============================================== > WebPage http://www.zoom-one.com > Electronics http://www.zoom-one.com/electron.htm > Instruments http://www.zoom-one.com/glgtech.htm > ============================================== > "DaveC" <anon@example.net> wrote in message > news:0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net... > Have assembled an array of LEDs for use as a 3rd brake light in my car, > configured as 4 rows of 9 jumbo LEDs, as of yet unwired. Of course the > power > supply will be 12 volts nominal (13.8 volts, maximum). > > My options, as I see them, are: > 1) Wire individual resistors to each LED based on its operating current > 2) Wire each row in parallel and connect one resistor based on operating > current for 9 LEDs > 3) Install voltage regulator to output voltage (ie, 1.3 volts?) to > operate > all LEDs in parallel. > > What is the best method to power these from an intermittent (whenever I > press > the brake pedal) power source? > > Other options for powering this array? > -- > Note that my return address is corrupted in an attempt to reduce spam. > If you > choose to e-mail me, please correct my address as described below. > > Thanks, > Dave > --- > Dave Carpenter > Sound Logic > voicebox@d8n8a8i.com > > Remove the numbers to reply via e-mail > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Vagn9.39041$Pz.33008@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net> <Rsan9.14070$qh1.1622310@news.ca.inter.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 1131b0,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid1131b0,public X-Google-Thread: 1118be,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid1118be,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,4ef4c9d4aea85e1f X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-04 05:53:09 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "C what I mean" <"NO SPAM"@yahll.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,alt.engineering.electrical,aus.electronics,sci.electronics.repair References: <0001HW.B9C26E7400A7161B165FEAC0@news.covad.net> <Rsan9.14070$qh1.1622310@news.ca.inter.net> Subject: Re: Best way to power array of LEDs? Lines: 64 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <Vagn9.39041$Pz.33008@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.246.190.42 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1033735989 12.246.190.42 (Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:53:09 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:53:09 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:53:09 GMT