🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:41:32 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>Joel Koltner wrote:
>
>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > That requires a dongle and to their chagrin they found it didn't work with
>> > XP because of the way XP controls access to the I/O. Their only resort was to
>> keep a W98SE > PC for the purpose.
>>
>> How about just upgrading to a newer version of Vutrax?
>
>Cost.


  Per seat price on sucky software isn't that much, pussy.
>
>> I've never used it, but their web site claims it works on XP, Vista, 64-bit
>> Windows... and even
>> Linux.
>
>They're cheapskates.

  They must have learned from you.

> Plus it would be a poor long-term value purchase in view of
>their likely file interchange requirements.

  Which is why the idiots should have bit the bullet and bought a REAL
PCB CAD package.  Alas, they are likely just as retarded as you are.

>> > Their use of Vutrax also means their CAD files are totally incompatible with
>> > virtually everyone else in
>> > the world but hey-ho ! As a result some products have ended up being drafted
>> > in no less than THREE
>> > packages. I've originated in Orcad for example. They complete the schematic
>> > design in Vutrax and the
>> > sub-contractor who was doing layout used PADS !
>>
>> They're just importing the netlist into PADS though, right?  So only one
>> re-drawing?  (What you did in ORCAD schematics to Vutrax schematics.)
>>
>> It's still poor, although I wouldn't really recommend anyway adopts ORCAD at
>> this point -- it's a pretty unimpressive piece of software for the price.
>
>Orcad isn't what it once was. Indeed it's dead now sadly but I still have DOS and
>Windows versions.

  You're an idiot.

>I think you overestimate the ability of certain participants when using the word
>'netlist'.

  I doubt that you even have a full grasp of the term.