🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #1768

Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?

#1768
From: kevin93
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 19:50
35 lines
3303 bytes
On May 18, 9:58 am, JosephKK <quiettechb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:58:49 -0700 (PDT), kevin93
<..>
> >This is done to maximize efficiency since the mechanical transmission
> >has an efficiency of 95% or more but the electrical losses through two
> >motor/generators are about 20%.
>
> That is way past remarkably crappy motor and generator efficiencies.
> Both are typically each 95 to 98 percent efficient.  Hell the antique
> "Molly Long Legs" topped 99%.
<...>

I don't know about those you mention but the published peak efficiency
of the ones in the Prius (including the inverter) are about 93%, put
two in series and the losses to convert from mechanical energy back to
mechanical energy when operating at peak efficiency would be about 15%
- for other operating conditions they can be a lot worse, hence my 20%
number.

AC Propulsion (www.acpropulsion.com) only claim 91% from battery to
shaft for their system with 86% with a "road load" (implying an
average under normal usage).  That is even lower than the Toyota
figure.

When considering regenerative efficiency the numbers get even worse -
the battery may only have a 70% efficiency giving only a 50% overall
energy recovery efficiency.

Undoubtedly the efficiency could be improved but would add weight and
cost - Toyota and Honda are the only manufacturers with real-world
experience of producing this class of machines in million unit
quantities so presumably these designs represent their view of the
optimum compromise for this application

kevin
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482EE95A.CA9A5635@hotmail.com> <jmdr2493oviid6g9870ashok62182ne1vv@4ax.com> <OdjXj.279$co7.84@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <482F810D.AC8F5CB2@hotmail.com> <njqXj.1135$BL6.119@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <pan.2008.05.17.01.18.00.888589@woa.com.au> <fnFXj.506$mh5.166@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com> <MPG.2298f55597cb285c9898e7@free.teranews.com> <9283198e-49a6-4153-b1e5-6a0da8ef31b5@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <nqn034h9dl5vqm7d1c2e309vokqlek1q8j@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,11cc866c366c95ec
X-Google-Thread: 103407,11cc866c366c95ec
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 12:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482EE95A.CA9A5635@hotmail.com> 
 <jmdr2493oviid6g9870ashok62182ne1vv@4ax.com> <OdjXj.279$co7.84@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <482F810D.AC8F5CB2@hotmail.com> <njqXj.1135$BL6.119@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <pan.2008.05.17.01.18.00.888589@woa.com.au> <fnFXj.506$mh5.166@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <MPG.2298f55597cb285c9898e7@free.teranews.com> <9283198e-49a6-4153-b1e5-6a0da8ef31b5@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <nqn034h9dl5vqm7d1c2e309vokqlek1q8j@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.116.66.161
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1211140226 6275 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2008 19:50:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 19:50:26 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.116.66.161; 
 posting-account=Jf_6BQoAAABLoKF4Ku8KsxDqTYaPlBN8
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) 
 Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)