Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?

Article View: sci.electronics.design

Article #1777

Back to sci.electronics.design Previous Next

#1777

From: MooseFET
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:25

10 lines
2367 bytes

On May 18, 3:00 pm, "Tim Williams" <tmoran...@charter.net> wrote:
[....]
> An electric field DC motor might be the easiest, but the field burns up a
> couple horsepower sitting there.  That would cut into efficiency a bit.
> [Asynchronous] AC motors are a bit harder to generate power from.

AC motors are not all that hard to generate power with, if you already
have AC power systems to run them.  If the slip frequency goes
negative, the terminal impedance of an AC motor has a negative real
component.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <dd5ae057-65e3-4cbe-92b9-94b8fadb6a20@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482EE95A.CA9A5635@hotmail.com> <jmdr2493oviid6g9870ashok62182ne1vv@4ax.com> <OdjXj.279$co7.84@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <482F810D.AC8F5CB2@hotmail.com> <njqXj.1135$BL6.119@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <pan.2008.05.17.01.18.00.888589@woa.com.au> <fnFXj.506$mh5.166@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com> <MPG.2298f55597cb285c9898e7@free.teranews.com> <9283198e-49a6-4153-b1e5-6a0da8ef31b5@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <nqn034h9dl5vqm7d1c2e309vokqlek1q8j@4ax.com> <4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <3G1Yj.28$lF7.12@newsfe05.lga>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,11cc866c366c95ec
X-Google-Thread: 103407,11cc866c366c95ec
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 15:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <dd5ae057-65e3-4cbe-92b9-94b8fadb6a20@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482EE95A.CA9A5635@hotmail.com> 
 <jmdr2493oviid6g9870ashok62182ne1vv@4ax.com> <OdjXj.279$co7.84@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <482F810D.AC8F5CB2@hotmail.com> <njqXj.1135$BL6.119@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <pan.2008.05.17.01.18.00.888589@woa.com.au> <fnFXj.506$mh5.166@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <MPG.2298f55597cb285c9898e7@free.teranews.com> <9283198e-49a6-4153-b1e5-6a0da8ef31b5@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <nqn034h9dl5vqm7d1c2e309vokqlek1q8j@4ax.com> <4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <3G1Yj.28$lF7.12@newsfe05.lga>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.170.248.151
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1211150244 1260 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2008 22:37:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:37:24 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.170.248.151; 
 posting-account=WpWCSgoAAAD-tgsKntNZep9MY4ctsgnu
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) 
 Gecko/20060527 SUSE/1.5.0.4-1.3 Firefox/1.5.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

Reply to Parent Message