Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #1824Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?
From: David L. Jones
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:24
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:24
69 lines
3325 bytes
3325 bytes
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:482FA872.804C42A9@hotmail.com... > > > "David L. Jones" wrote: > >> I just saw the movie Who Killed the Electric Car?: >> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489037/ >> >> Fantastic! > > It completely misses the point. Sounds like it's you who missed the point of the movie. >> Everyone should watch this one. >> The IMDB user comment is spot on - " This film WILL frustrate you >> greatly" >> In fact, it's enough to make you want to cry. >> >> Can't believe I had never heard of the movie before the other day. > > http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/11/the-ev-1-wasnt-killed-it-was-dead-on-arrival/ > > Required to do so, GM went on to make the EV-1. It used lead acid > batteries > which held 0.4% as much energy as the same weight of gasoline. Irrelevant. > Thus the EV-1 > weighed 2970 lbs, 1175 lbs of which were the batteries. Also irrelevant. > The resulting range > was 90/70 miles hwy/city. Plenty enough for the majority of people. Especially when you can conveniently recharge at home, at work, or at a shopping centre etc. > To achieve this, the tiny two-seater also had to > have the record lowest CD, the most advanced powertrain of the day, and a > cost > of $80,000 (they were only leased to consumers). So what? price would come down in time. Thousands of people buy $80,00 cars every day. No excuse for GM to go to ridiculous lengths to get back every one of the cars and then crush them literally out of existence. Especially when there were thousands who would have taken them off their hands and waived all rights to support. GM did an evil thing, just evil. > The article concludes: > > "In the end, though, the price wasn't an issue. The reality is the EV1 was > hostage to a technology the engineers knew from the get-go just wasn't > able to > do the job Roger Smith and the California Air Resources Board believed it > could. That's what killed the electric car." Everyone had better rush and get one of those Humvees with the $100,000 Bush government tax rebate before the new government gets in. Or has that fire-sale finished already? Dave.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<482edc76$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482FA872.804C42A9@hotmail.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,11cc866c366c95ec X-Google-Thread: 103407,11cc866c366c95ec X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics References: <482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482FA872.804C42A9@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Who Killed the Electric Car? Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 23:24:12 +1000 Lines: 71 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.241.52.134 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.241.52.134 Message-ID: <482edc76$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> X-Trace: dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au 1211030646 60.241.52.134 (17 May 2008 23:24:06 +1100) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mail