Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #1904Re: Agilent Oscilloscope - ripoff or rebadge?
From: Joerg
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 20:11
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 20:11
61 lines
4227 bytes
4227 bytes
Paul E. Schoen wrote: > "legg" <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote in message > news:npom14hhrk3vhemsr1hlthi127h3s1no82@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:30:11 -0700, "Joel Koltner" >> <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> "Tom Bruhns" <k7itm@msn.com> wrote in message >>> news:fb1638c1-9e26-45fb-8a31-d1779f26c9e6@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... >>>> _HP's_ design??!! Puleeeezzz! >>> I know they didn't design the hardware itself, but don't you think they >>> still >>> "designed" the interface (both GUI and mechanical)? Or did Rigol or >>> whoever >>> it was already have that design out before HP came along? >>> >> I think his point was that Tek lead with cheap DPO's.(and usable >> triggering) > > In the late 1980's I was in the market for a DSO, and I worked for a > company that was a stocking distributor and service center for Tektronics. > However, the programming interface was klunky, and the controls were not > laid out very well. They even had a test board to check performance. I > wound up purchasing a Hitachi storage scope, which I still use today. It's > only 60 MHz but I don't do RF, and it's fine for switching power supplies, > audio, and line frequency work that is my usual fare. > > I had always liked HP scopes over Tek, and I still have an HP130A. I liked > their panel layouts, and the large knobs with a subdued color scheme and a > very positive feel. There is a picture of this model (along with racks of > old HP equipment) in this website I found: > IMHO Tek had the better trigger sensitivity and behavior. > http://www.kennethkuhn.com/hpmuseum/hp_tour.htm > Oh man, my wife would have a fit if I ran a museum as large as that. > I also had one of the HP200B oscillators with rounded corners that was > vintage 1941, but I gave it away with a lot of other old equipment for > which I did not have room (or use). It's nice to know someone cares enough > to preserve this legacy. > How did they mill the numbers and such into the metal in those days? They didn't have CNC back then. I've got an old Rhode&Schwarz SMF that dates back to that era, but with a tired tube in there. My wife would like it if it went into the hands of someone who treasures that, as long as that someone isn't me ;-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dAKSj.77$8i5.16@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com.POSTED!78df62d6!not-for-mailReferences:
<481aed02@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481aef47$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <ICHSj.76029$Uf4.29948@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <fb1638c1-9e26-45fb-8a31-d1779f26c9e6@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <Y4JSj.153529$ng7.69423@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com> <npom14hhrk3vhemsr1hlthi127h3s1no82@4ax.com> <481b7137$0$19807$ecde5a14@news.coretel.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,71b45677395e982 X-Google-Thread: 103407,71b45677395e982 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com.POSTED!78df62d6!not-for-mail From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: Agilent Oscilloscope - ripoff or rebadge? References: <481aed02@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481aef47$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <ICHSj.76029$Uf4.29948@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <fb1638c1-9e26-45fb-8a31-d1779f26c9e6@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <Y4JSj.153529$ng7.69423@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com> <npom14hhrk3vhemsr1hlthi127h3s1no82@4ax.com> <481b7137$0$19807$ecde5a14@news.coretel.net> In-Reply-To: <481b7137$0$19807$ecde5a14@news.coretel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 61 Message-ID: <dAKSj.77$8i5.16@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.26.185.77 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com 1209759113 ST000 75.26.185.77 (Fri, 02 May 2008 16:11:53 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 16:11:53 EDT Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: [[PA@SNDZJWWSUD[MBIDM^P@VZ\LPCXLLBWLOOAF@YUDUWYAKVUOPCW[ML\JXUCKVFDYZKBMSFX^OMSAFNTINTDDMVW[X\THOPXZRVOCJTUTPC\_JSBVX\KAOTBAJBVMZTYAKMNLDI_MFDSSOLXINH__FS^\WQGHGI^C@E[A_CF\AQLDQ\BTMPLDFNVUQ_VM Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 13:11:51 -0700