Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #1910Re: Agilent Oscilloscope - ripoff or rebadge?
From: Tom Bruhns
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 22:47
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 22:47
45 lines
4130 bytes
4130 bytes
On May 2, 2:33 pm, "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgro...@yahoo.com> wrote: > "Joerg" <notthisjoerg...@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message > > news:LWKSj.8203$iK6.2303@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com... > > > For EEs the reason is that while they are motivated most never had exposure > > to real hardware. Because everything was given to them. When their radio, > > toy, whatever broke they just got new one and chucked the broken one. > > Yes, although starting somewhere in the '80s even if they had wanted to repair > the old one it became substantially harder as more and more discrete > components ended up inside of hard-to-source ICs. I wonder if there are even > any professional TV reapair shops left that troubleshoot to the component > level rather than just the module level? (Since of course with labor costs > being what they are relative to new modules cost, it's generally cheaper not > to do so.) > > ---Joel My cousin was driven out of that business quite a few years ago. Things got both more reliable and more expensive to fix if they did break, and at the same time, the feature set introduction rate increased, making it less attractive to keep the old stuff; now it's replaced even if it is working, just to get new features. But I don't agree that the current crop of EE grads are inferior; they are simply different. Not as large a percentage are into the same sort of hardware that was designed 20 years ago, but then we're not designing that sort of hardware now anyway. An FPGA in BGA running GHz clock rates on serial ports isn't something you can plug into a little white breadboard, but inside that part can easily be logic that would have spilled over ten large logic boards 20 years ago. The new grads we've hired in the last few years don't have the same skill set as new grads of 20 years ago, but I also don't see them being afraid to do hardware designs. I'd also be happy to trade some of the 50+ year old long-time drivers I see on the road around here for some much younger ones that have gone through driver education and licensing in Germany recently. Time behind the wheel doesn't cure idiotic behavior. One might hope the worst of the idiots would kill themselves off, but there always seem to be more to take their places. Cheers, Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<86658f57-655d-41ae-bf87-616ab50bb630@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<481aed02@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481aef47$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <ICHSj.76029$Uf4.29948@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <fb1638c1-9e26-45fb-8a31-d1779f26c9e6@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <Y4JSj.153529$ng7.69423@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com> <npom14hhrk3vhemsr1hlthi127h3s1no82@4ax.com> <481b7137$0$19807$ecde5a14@news.coretel.net> <FJKSj.76905$Uf4.67909@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <LWKSj.8203$iK6.2303@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <RMLSj.141441$Gv.61794@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,71b45677395e982 X-Google-Thread: 103407,71b45677395e982 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Tom Bruhns <k7itm@msn.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: Agilent Oscilloscope - ripoff or rebadge? Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 15:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 45 Message-ID: <86658f57-655d-41ae-bf87-616ab50bb630@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <481aed02@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481aef47$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <ICHSj.76029$Uf4.29948@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <fb1638c1-9e26-45fb-8a31-d1779f26c9e6@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <Y4JSj.153529$ng7.69423@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com> <npom14hhrk3vhemsr1hlthi127h3s1no82@4ax.com> <481b7137$0$19807$ecde5a14@news.coretel.net> <FJKSj.76905$Uf4.67909@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <LWKSj.8203$iK6.2303@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <RMLSj.141441$Gv.61794@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.25.142.225 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1209768473 28879 127.0.0.1 (2 May 2008 22:47:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 22:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.25.142.225; posting-account=uiivuwkAAADKlh9jd4TJzpBGWedvsUqf User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)