Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #1931Re: Agilent Oscilloscope - ripoff or rebadge?
From: Trevor Wilson
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 21:08
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 21:08
95 lines
5323 bytes
5323 bytes
"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote in message news:481dafe1$0$2843$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:685281F2r9q9cU1@mid.individual.net... >> >> "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote in message >> news:481d3908$0$2856$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:6846nnF2rm6o4U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> >>>> "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au... >>>>> "Tom" <Tom@nospam.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au... >>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Q_irQTOUwA >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for that. >>>>> >>>>> http://rtr.ca/welec_w2022a/ >>>>> Ouch! Obviously not re-badge... >>>> >>>> **Ouch indeed. If something looks too good to be true..... >>>> >>>> For the record: A mate travelled to China late last year (he is a tech) >>>> and I instructed him to find and purchase a Rigol 'scope for me. The >>>> prices asked were not so different to those in Australia. Further: His >>>> girlfriend is Chinese and performed all negotiations for him. He was >>>> unable to obtain one at what I consider was a reasonable price (IE: >>>> Around $500.00 for a model which sells for around $1,800.00 in Oz). >>>> >>>> Trevor Wilson >>> Just goes to show that 50 years of Communism didn't squash a good >>> capitalist idea. >>> $500 for a $1800 rrp in Oz is bit much of an ask TW. It isn't an ME >>> amplifier. :P >>> Maybe $700 - 800? >> >> **Given that I know of one popular Chinese built CD player which sells in >> Australia for nearly $4k and has an FOB price of US$400.00 in China, >> then, no. $500.00 sounds about right. Aussies are being gouged for a lot >> of Chinese built products right now. If I buy a product which is built in >> a developing nation, I expect to pay developing nation prices. It's like >> my favourite hiking boots. Ecco. They were made in Denmark and cost >> $270.00 a pair. Now, they're made in Malaysia and STILL cost $270.00 a >> pair. As a consequence, I no longer support the brand. >> >> Trevor Wilson > That doesn't surprise me TW. Nearly everything is made in 3rd world > countries these days. **Yep. If a product is made in a developing nation, it needs to offer significant differences (lower price, higher performance, etc) for me to buy it. The difficulty is that as more products are built in DNs, it will be harder to identify the rip-offs. It is also difficult for consumers to identify companies which treat employees unfairly. However, experience tells us that China will eventually move to a fairer system (for employees) and consequently higher prices to the consumer. I'm guessing this may take at least 10 years or so. > Cheap labour, no penalty rates, poor or not existent OH&S, zero > environmental policies - you name it. **Indeed. > > Unfortunately most Australian customers are still going to by the Ecco > shoes. **That is a good thing and a bad thing. Even though they are sourced from Malaysia, they are excellent shoes. Unfortunately, the pricing model is still operating as if they were manufactured in Denmark. They don't care unless the price actually goes up significantly and > they don't care where they are made or under what conditions. Just take a > look at Nokia mobile phones. Still one of the leading brands - now made > in China. **Yep. Unfortunately, Nokia has probably been forced to do so. They operate in an incredibly competitive market place. Perhaps they should take a leaf from B&O's book: http://www.cnet.com.au/mobilephones/phones/0,239025953,339285481,00.htm A mobile 'phone for 2 GRAND! AND it's made in Korea! No camera, no GPS. Just a 'phone and a music player. Trevor Wilson Trevor Wilson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<686mvfF2s1kulU1@mid.individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<481aed02@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481aef47$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <6846nnF2rm6o4U1@mid.individual.net> <481d3908$0$2856$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <685281F2r9q9cU1@mid.individual.net> <481dafe1$0$2843$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,71b45677395e982 X-Google-Thread: 103407,71b45677395e982 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: Agilent Oscilloscope - ripoff or rebadge? Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 07:08:49 +1000 Lines: 97 Message-ID: <686mvfF2s1kulU1@mid.individual.net> References: <481aed02@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481aef47$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b023b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <481b06ff$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <6846nnF2rm6o4U1@mid.individual.net> <481d3908$0$2856$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <685281F2r9q9cU1@mid.individual.net> <481dafe1$0$2843$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> X-Trace: individual.net Lk/sWqppfSI8HFaHfOskOgDJM9r0B1jzaj1+6zqnUJVal5h8Cl Cancel-Lock: sha1:5JyUd0pvaCHX21mwpqEdWYk9GKE= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080504-0, 04/05/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean