Re: Choosing voltage opamp

Article View: sci.electronics.design

Article #2041

Back to sci.electronics.design Previous Next

#2041

From: Vitaliy
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:53

23 lines
2256 bytes

Hi Kevin,

On OPA657 output voltage swing with normal operating conditions (+25C)
is +-3.9V.

I think the following opamps have similar specs to MAX477 Mark
suggested.


http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/sn10501.html
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/opa690.html
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/opa820.html

Vitaliy

Kevin White wrote:
>
> You keep mentioning 10V p-p, but if you have a conventional
> transimpedance amplifier you will get a unipolar signal so you will
> only get a maximum of 5vp-p (0v to +5V) unless you offset the output or
> AC couple the output amplifier.
> 
> kevin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1159725197.217350.232310@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1159037241.672300.204950@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1159054293.852757.184420@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <7iSRg.15$KW5.10@newsfe02.lga> <1159475762.984027.308740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1159544975.956446.318660@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Thread: 103407,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid111d0a,gid103407,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Vitaliy" <vmykhayl@ee.ryerson.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: Choosing voltage opamp
Date: 1 Oct 2006 10:53:17 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <1159725197.217350.232310@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
   <1159037241.672300.204950@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1159054293.852757.184420@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
   <7iSRg.15$KW5.10@newsfe02.lga>
   <1159475762.984027.308740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1159544975.956446.318660@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.194.13.100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159725201 5330 127.0.0.1 (1 Oct 2006 17:53:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:53:21 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1159544975.956446.318660@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.194.13.100;
   posting-account=y8LvZQ0AAAAaJu-ufjWjKg4Mvxudys0H

Reply to Parent Message