🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2056

Re: Choosing voltage opamp

#2056
From: David L. Jones
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:18
16 lines
1930 bytes
Vitaliy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking to add the 2nd stage to photodiode transimpedance
> amplifier. All I want to achieve by 2nd stage is voltage gain and
> capability to drive 50 Ohm loads. The first stage is OPA657.
>
> 1) a) Given power supply for opamp +-5V, should I select the opamp that
> has Io,max=>200mA. I do expect Vpeak-to-peak,output to be 10V.
>    b) Is that output current achievable only at maximum supply voltage,
> or as long as

You won't get 10Vp-p output from an opamp with +/-5V rails, you need a
larger supply voltage.

Dave :)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1159049884.197003.19360@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Thread: 103407,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid111d0a,gid103407,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: Choosing voltage opamp
Date: 23 Sep 2006 15:18:04 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1159049884.197003.19360@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.130.4.21
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159049888 19457 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2006 22:18:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.130.4.21;
   posting-account=uuUYvgwAAADSJ3KQCTlHipSxNh8rODsn