🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2059

Re: Choosing voltage opamp

#2059
From: Vitaliy
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:22
28 lines
2441 bytes
I'm not sure if I'm answering my own question, but I can put 1MOhm at
the input of opamp to the ground.

Vitaliy

Vitaliy wrote:
> I've been trying to do that.
>
> In a lot of examples on the datasheets of amplifiers I'm looking for, I
> see they are using 50Ohm input. However, I know for sure (test results)
> that output of the first stage (photodiode amp) does not work with
> 50Ohm loads, but works with 1MOhm loads. Should I be concerned about
> that?
>
> Vitaliy
> >
> > All of the usual suspects (National, TI [including Burr-Brown], Linear
> > tech, AD and others) make devices specifically designed to drive 50 ohm
> > loads.
> >
> > Check out the websites and use the parametric search function and
> > specify 50 ohm load and then choose a suitable device. We don't know
> > what type of load that is beyond 50 ohm, so the above is the only
> > advice I can give.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > PeteS
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1159057343.094114.123640@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1159037241.672300.204950@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1159054293.852757.184420@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Thread: 103407,c037ff6b3e0ae32c
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid111d0a,gid103407,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Vitaliy" <vmykhayl@ee.ryerson.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,aus.electronics
Subject: Re: Choosing voltage opamp
Date: 23 Sep 2006 17:22:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <1159057343.094114.123640@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
   <1159037241.672300.204950@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1159054293.852757.184420@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.117.1.158
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159057348 4522 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2006 00:22:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:22:28 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1159054293.852757.184420@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060504 Fedora/1.5.0.3-1.1.fc5 Firefox/1.5.0.3 pango-text,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=141.117.1.158;
   posting-account=y8LvZQ0AAAAaJu-ufjWjKg4Mvxudys0H