Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2062Re: Choosing voltage opamp
From: David L. Jones
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:28
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:28
17 lines
2169 bytes
2169 bytes
Vitaliy wrote: > Hi David, > > Is the maximum Vp-p I can get from an opamp with +/-5V rails 5V then? > I know I measured the output of transimpedance amplifier and I was > getting maximum ~8Vp-p :confused: It depends on the particular device. As a general rule of thumb an opamp can get to within at least 2V of either rail, so a +/-5V supply will give you at a minimum +/-3V. Your opamp could aboviously get within 1V of the rail to give you 8Vp-p. There are "rail-to-rail" opamps that claim to get very close to the full output voltage rail, but usually not at any significant output current. You need a higher rail voltage regardless of the device you choose. Dave :)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1159082931.013808.167160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1159049884.197003.19360@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1159055088.803133.110670@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,c037ff6b3e0ae32c X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,c037ff6b3e0ae32c X-Google-Thread: 103407,c037ff6b3e0ae32c X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid111d0a,gid103407,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,aus.electronics Subject: Re: Choosing voltage opamp Date: 24 Sep 2006 00:28:51 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 18 Message-ID: <1159082931.013808.167160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> References: <1159031128.442881.267560@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1159049884.197003.19360@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1159055088.803133.110670@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.130.4.21 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159082936 31088 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2006 07:28:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:28:56 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1159055088.803133.110670@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.130.4.21; posting-account=uuUYvgwAAADSJ3KQCTlHipSxNh8rODsn