🚀 go-pugleaf

A clueless Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:

>On 2012-03-15, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On a sunny day (Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:10:58 +0000 (UTC)) it happened Andrew
>> Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote in
>><slrn3vfsjm41k2.7go.andrews@sdf.lonestar.org>:
>>
>>>On 2012-03-15, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So then there are the guys running a 60 Hz display, probably
>>>> most of the peesees, and feeding that with HDMI into the latest LCD TV,
>>>> and then play a 50 Hz movie on it.
>>>> I have tried all that to see what happens, and it is shit.
>>>
>>>...and even if you DO match the frame rates you are still watching
>>>a film originally shot at 24 Hz.
>>
>> We play the 24 films at 25,
>> That makes them shorter, a good thing with most Hollywood crap,
>> and it also increases the pitch of the voices,
>> so we think all those Hollywood actors are pussies.
>
>At 25 Hz PAL, sure,

This is Europe, 50 Hz rules, PAL is a color system, not a standard that says anything about H or V frequencies.

>but not 30 Hz NTSC.



>You can make exactly the
>same point with imported videos.

What point?


>And as for the out of pitch
>soundtrack that hasn't been true for 20 years or so.

Oh really? Sure there is digital processing,
but you can play old 35 mm material with optical sound track,
and then it is true,

> Similarly,
>the lies you refer to much later in a largely irrelevant post are
>deinterlacing artifcats rather than anything to do with frame frame.

Look up interlacing on wikipedia, so you  get a clue.

Lies? What sort of agenda do you have? Are you actually involved in the pushing
of that strawberry pudding? Or some Linux distro that tries to
sell itself as media player?
Or maybe you are a self-justifying victim of buying a strawberry?
Get a life man, you sound like the average American clueless idiot.


>Get ssome current understanding, come back in six months if you
>still have an axe to grind.  It's perfectly clear to me now that
>that is all this is.

I pointed out that if you sell your strawberry soup as 'mediaplayer',
that then that is a bit of an over statement, now is it not?
Now that may be hard to swallow for those who forked out cash for that purpose,
or for those who want to make some cash selling that stuff,
but it remains a simple commonly known fact for those who have a clue.


 
So, in short:
Maybe you should come back later with a better temper, some sense of humor,
and most of all a clue.

Conversation seems wasted in you, not one technical argument in your postings,
you do not even know the difference between PAL and frame rates.
And you are too arrogant to learn, and to insulting to teach.
As my PC often used to say,
beep